These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645338)
1. Interobserver variability in assessing adequacy of the squamous component in conventional cervicovaginal smears. Sheffield MV; Simsir A; Talley L; Roberson AJ; Elgert PA; Chhieng DC Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 12645338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate. Moore D; Pugh-Cain D; Walker T Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 18713249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance of unsatisfactory conventional pap smears owing to inadequate squamous cellularity defined by the Bethesda 2001 criterion. Adams AL; Gidley J; Roberson J; Wang W; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 May; 123(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 15981813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears. Gupta DK; Komaromy-Hiller G; Raab SS; Nath ME Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 11575646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of estimating the adequacy of the squamous component of cervicovaginal smears. Renshaw AA; Friedman MM; Rahemtulla A; Granter SR; Dean BR; Cronin JA; Jiroutek M; Cibas ES Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jan; 111(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 9894452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Factors Associated with Specimen Adequacy for Conventional Cervical Cytology in Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand. Anantaworapot A; Manusook S; Tanprasertkul C; Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4209-4212. PubMed ID: 27797219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin. Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: an Italian experience. Montanari G; Confortini M; Bellomi A; Cocchi V; Dalla Palma P; D'Ambrosio E; Giovagnoli MR; Navone R; Ronco G; Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12672101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cervicovaginal smear adequacy. The Bethesda System guidelines and reproducibility. Spires SE; Banks ER; Weeks JA; Banks HW; Davey DD Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Sep; 102(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 8085560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ASCCP patient management guidelines: Pap test specimen adequacy and quality indicators. Davey DD; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Buck HW; Cox JT; Darragh TM; Elgert PA; Hanson V; Henry MR; Waldman J; Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 12428791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of the new Bethesda System 2001 on specimen adequacy of conventional cervicovaginal smears. Fidda N; Miron J; Rodgers WH; Rader A Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 15048956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of the quality of Papanicolaou smears on the detection of cytologic abnormalities. Mintzer M; Curtis P; Resnick JC; Morrell D Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 10385441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation in the assessment of adequacy in cervical smears. Migliore G; Rossi E; Aldovini A; Mudu P; Alderisio M; Giovagnoli MR; Fabiano A; Morosini PL; Branca M Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 11843939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should adequacy criteria in cervicovaginal cytology be modified after radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hysterectomy? Lu CH; Chang CC; Ho ES; Chen SJ; Lin SJ; Fu TF; Chang MC Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 118(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 20862703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria - a longitudinal evaluation. Rásky É; Regitnig P; Schenouda M; Burkert N; Freidl W BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():998. PubMed ID: 24152300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assessment and improvement of "Unsatisfactory" liquid-based cervicovaginal papanicolaou smears. Mirzamani N; Chau K; Rafael O; Shergill U; Sajjan S; Sumskaya I; Gimenez C; Klein M; Das K Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):873-877. PubMed ID: 28752611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]