These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645338)

  • 21. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
    Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Atypical Glandular Cells: Interobserver Variability according to Clinical Management.
    Lepe M; Eklund CM; Quddus MR; Paquette C
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):397-404. PubMed ID: 29969775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The determination of Papanicolaou smear adequacy using a semiquantitative method to evaluate cellularity.
    Valente PT; Schantz HD; Trabal JF
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(6):576-80. PubMed ID: 1769285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous quality improvement project.
    Roberson J; Connolly K; St John K; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12203868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interobserver variability of a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Raab SS; Geisinger KR; Silverman JF; Thomas PA; Stanley MW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Nov; 110(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 9802352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical cytology specimen adequacy: patient management guidelines and optimizing specimen collection.
    Davey DD; Cox JT; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Colgan TJ; Howell LP; Husain M; Darragh TM
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Apr; 12(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 18369299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
    Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cervical pap smears: techniques and clinical significance].
    Lambert C
    Rev Med Liege; 1999 Apr; 54(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 10389474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
    Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does speculum lubricant affect liquid-based Papanicolaou test adequacy?
    Lin SN; Taylor J; Alperstein S; Hoda R; Holcomb K
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Mar; 122(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 24254917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.
    Sass MA
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14969176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of smear quality on the rate of detecting significant cervical cytologic abnormalities.
    Henry JA; Wadehra V
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 8669190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears.
    Klinkhamer PJ; Vooijs GP; de Haan AF
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 2929223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adequacy of cellular material in split-sampling of cervical scrapings for routine cancer screening: an analysis of 702 smears.
    Othman N; Othman NH
    Malays J Pathol; 2012 Dec; 34(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 23424773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
    Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
    Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital images for interobserver variability comparison in cervicovaginal cytology.
    Tinacci G; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi F; Foggi A; Miccinesi G; Mirri F; Pasquini P; Zappa M; Confortini M
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 12630075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accurate assessment of cell density in low cellular liquid-based cervical cytology.
    Siebers AG; van der Laak JA; Huberts-Manders R; Vedder JE; Bulten J
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22708685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Telecytology: intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of cervical-vaginal smears.
    Alli PM; Ollayos CW; Thompson LD; Kapadia I; Butler DR; Williams BH; Rosenthal DL; O'leary TJ
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Dec; 32(12):1318-22. PubMed ID: 11774163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis: study of CRISAP Ile-de-France].
    Barrès D; Bergeron C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Feb; 28(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 10758586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.