BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645556)

  • 1. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "But whoever treasures freedom...": the right to travel and extraterritorial abortions.
    Kreimer SF
    Mich Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 91(5):907-38. PubMed ID: 11656299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
    Roden GJ
    Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gaining a right to abortion in the United States and Canada: the role of judicial capacities.
    DeLorme L
    Berkeley J Sociol; 1991; 36():93-114. PubMed ID: 11656333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
    Picher PC
    Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.
    Horan DJ; Forsythe CD; Grant ER
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1987; 6(2):229-311. PubMed ID: 16086461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Granfield D
    Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe.
    Solomon D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion laws: comparative and feminist perspectives in Australia, England and the United States.
    Petersen K
    Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):77-105. PubMed ID: 11657551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.