These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645608)

  • 21. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey.
    West RL
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
    Merchant J
    Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproduction, rights and public policy: a framework for assessment.
    Gowri A
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 12656084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The abortion cases...and Justice O'Connor.
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gaining a right to abortion in the United States and Canada: the role of judicial capacities.
    DeLorme L
    Berkeley J Sociol; 1991; 36():93-114. PubMed ID: 11656333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Greenville Women's Clinic v. Bryant.
    U.S. District Court. D. South Carolina, Greenville Division
    Wests Fed Suppl; 2000; 66(F. Supp. 2d):691-745. PubMed ID: 12664905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.