These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12645608)

  • 41. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN; Law SA
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Physician assisted suicide: its challenge to the prevailing constitutional paradigm.
    Robinson JH
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):345-66. PubMed ID: 11652999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
    Goldstein RD
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Abortion law today.
    Field MA
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause.
    Looper-Friedman SE
    New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A woman's right, barely viable.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():28. PubMed ID: 11646727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Cerny RA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cultural feminism: it sounds good, but will it work? Application to a husband's interest in his wife's abortion decision.
    Brunner SD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1996; 22(1):101-23. PubMed ID: 16437821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
    Schmidt CG
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.