BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12646035)

  • 1. A comparison of physiochemical property profiles of development and marketed oral drugs.
    Wenlock MC; Austin RP; Barton P; Davis AM; Leeson PD
    J Med Chem; 2003 Mar; 46(7):1250-6. PubMed ID: 12646035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs.
    Leeson PD; Davis AM
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(25):6338-48. PubMed ID: 15566303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs.
    Vieth M; Siegel MG; Higgs RE; Watson IA; Robertson DH; Savin KA; Durst GL; Hipskind PA
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 14695836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In silico prediction of the solubility advantage for amorphous drugs - Are there property-based rules for drug discovery and early pharmaceutical development?
    Kuentz M; Imanidis G
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2013 Feb; 48(3):554-62. PubMed ID: 23262058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of physicochemical property profiles of marketed oral drugs and orally bioavailable anti-cancer protein kinase inhibitors in clinical development.
    Gill AL; Verdonk M; Boyle RG; Taylor R
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2007; 7(14):1408-22. PubMed ID: 17692029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lipid-based formulations for oral administration of poorly water-soluble drugs.
    Mu H; Holm R; Müllertz A
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Aug; 453(1):215-24. PubMed ID: 23578826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular inflation, attrition and the rule of five.
    Leeson PD
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2016 Jun; 101():22-33. PubMed ID: 26836397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dependence of molecular properties on proteomic family for marketed oral drugs.
    Vieth M; Sutherland JJ
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 49(12):3451-3. PubMed ID: 16759087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of synthetic oral drug properties.
    Proudfoot JR
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2005 Feb; 15(4):1087-90. PubMed ID: 15686918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorption classification of oral drugs based on molecular surface properties.
    Bergström CA; Strafford M; Lazorova L; Avdeef A; Luthman K; Artursson P
    J Med Chem; 2003 Feb; 46(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 12570377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macrocyclic drugs and clinical candidates: what can medicinal chemists learn from their properties?
    Giordanetto F; Kihlberg J
    J Med Chem; 2014 Jan; 57(2):278-95. PubMed ID: 24044773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery.
    Hopkins AL; Keserü GM; Leeson PD; Rees DC; Reynolds CH
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2014 Feb; 13(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 24481311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity.
    Bayliss MK; Butler J; Feldman PL; Green DV; Leeson PD; Palovich MR; Taylor AJ
    Drug Discov Today; 2016 Oct; 21(10):1719-1727. PubMed ID: 27423371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug-likeness and increased hydrophobicity of commercially available compound libraries for drug screening.
    Zuegg J; Cooper MA
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2012; 12(14):1500-13. PubMed ID: 22827520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving drug candidates by design: a focus on physicochemical properties as a means of improving compound disposition and safety.
    Meanwell NA
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1420-56. PubMed ID: 21790149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral druggable space beyond the rule of 5: insights from drugs and clinical candidates.
    Doak BC; Over B; Giordanetto F; Kihlberg J
    Chem Biol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1115-42. PubMed ID: 25237858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmaceutical profiling in drug discovery.
    Kerns EH; Di L
    Drug Discov Today; 2003 Apr; 8(7):316-23. PubMed ID: 12654544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The physicochemical challenges of designing multiple ligands.
    Morphy R; Rankovic Z
    J Med Chem; 2006 Aug; 49(16):4961-70. PubMed ID: 16884308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of molecular properties on oral bioavailability of lipophilic drugs - mapping of bulkiness and different measures of polarity.
    Kuentz MT; Arnold Y
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2009; 14(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 19235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Poorly soluble marketed drugs display solvation limited solubility.
    Bergström CA; Wassvik CM; Johansson K; Hubatsch I
    J Med Chem; 2007 Nov; 50(23):5858-62. PubMed ID: 17929794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.