198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12646432)
1. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.
Houssami N; Irwig L; Simpson JM; McKessar M; Blome S; Noakes J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):935-40. PubMed ID: 12646432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI.
Elsamaloty H; Elzawawi MS; Mohammad S; Herial N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):1142-8. PubMed ID: 19304726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 12646427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging.
Brem RF; Ioffe M; Rapelyea JA; Yost KG; Weigert JM; Bertrand ML; Stern LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 19155397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience.
Nakano S; Yoshida M; Fujii K; Yorozuya K; Mouri Y; Kousaka J; Fukutomi T; Kimura J; Ishiguchi T; Ohno K; Mizumoto T; Harao M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 39(9):552-9. PubMed ID: 19654132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
Day D
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Imaging of breast tissues changes--early detection, screening and problem solving].
Wruk D
Ther Umsch; 2008 Apr; 65(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 18622909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paget's disease of the breast: accuracy of preoperative assessment.
Zakaria S; Pantvaidya G; Ghosh K; Degnim AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Apr; 102(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 17028984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Bolivar AV; Gomez SS; Merino P; Alonso-Bartolomé P; Garcia EO; Cacho PM; Hoffmeister JW
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1086-92. PubMed ID: 20883182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation.
Ghai S; Muradali D; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):481-7. PubMed ID: 16037524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [In situ ductal carcinoma of the breast: a diagnostic challenge].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):69-73. PubMed ID: 12621847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hata T; Takahashi H; Watanabe K; Takahashi M; Taguchi K; Itoh T; Todo S
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Feb; 198(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 14759774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
