338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12647090)
1. [The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research].
Kaltenborn KF; Kuhn K
Med Klin (Munich); 2003 Mar; 98(3):153-69. PubMed ID: 12647090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused?
Scully C; Lodge H
Br Dent J; 2005 Apr; 198(7):391-3. PubMed ID: 15870789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.
Scully C
Community Dent Health; 2007 Sep; 24(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 17958071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations.
Winker K
Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):400-2. PubMed ID: 21538415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature.
Andersen J; Belmont J; Cho CT
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2006 Dec; 39(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 17164944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
Pendlebury DA
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participation of women in human biology, 1975-2001.
Stinson S
Am J Hum Biol; 2003; 15(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 12704720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The AWMF model for the evaluation of published research papers in medicine. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Working Group of the Scientific Medical Specialty Societies)].
Frömter E; Brähler E; Langenbeck U; Meenen NM; Usadel KH
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Jul; 124(30):910-5. PubMed ID: 10464494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The counting house.
Adam D
Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Authors, editors, policy makers, and the impact factor.
Huth EJ
Croat Med J; 2001 Feb; 42(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 11172650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
Dahlqvist R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.
Habibzadeh F
Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jun; 83(6):404. PubMed ID: 15976887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools.
Döring TF
Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7129):709. PubMed ID: 17301769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the JIF of mycoses: a challenge with several facets.
Korting HC
Mycoses; 2007 Sep; 50(5):331. PubMed ID: 17714355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.
Moed HF
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19219533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Health services research and guidelines--from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies' (AWMF) perspective].
von Troschkel J; Selbmann HK; Encke A
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(8):597-602. PubMed ID: 17175755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring the outputs of nursing research and development in Australia: the researchers.
Wilkes L; Borbasi S; Hawes C; Stewart M; May D
Aust J Adv Nurs; 2002; 19(4):15-20. PubMed ID: 12118730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
Törnqvist TE
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
