176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12647209)
1. Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.
Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Kwast T
Virchows Arch; 2003 Mar; 442(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 12647209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Montironi R; van der Kwast T; Boccon-Gibod L; Bono AV; Boccon-Gibod L
Eur Urol; 2003 Dec; 44(6):626-36. PubMed ID: 14644113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens and diagnostic reporting of pathological findings.
Montironi R; Lopez-Beltran A; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Bollito E
Pathologica; 2001 Jun; 93(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 11433618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens.
Srigley JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of prognostic factors in radical prostatectomy specimens with cancer.
Mazzucchelli R; Santinelli A; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M; Montironi R
Urol Int; 2002; 68(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 12053019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate. Practice parameters, pathologic staging, and handling radical prostatectomy specimens.
Sakr WA; Grignon DJ
Urol Clin North Am; 1999 Aug; 26(3):453-63, v. PubMed ID: 10494284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy: processing, staging, and prognosis. Parts I and II.
Epstein JI
Int J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jun; 18(3 Suppl):118S-123S. PubMed ID: 20484275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Key elements in structured histopathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kench JG; Clouston DR; Delprado W; Eade T; Ellis D; Horvath LG; Samaratunga H; Stahl J; Stapleton AM; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
Pathology; 2011 Aug; 43(5):410-9. PubMed ID: 21716159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Search for residual prostate cancer on pT0 radical prostatectomy after positive biopsy.
Mazzucchelli R; Barbisan F; Tagliabracci A; Lopez-Beltran A; Cheng L; Scarpelli M; Montironi R
Virchows Arch; 2007 Apr; 450(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 17285325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.
Epstein JI; Amin M; Boccon-Gibod L; Egevad L; Humphrey PA; Mikuz G; Newling D; Nilsson S; Sakr W; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Montironi R
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2005 May; (216):34-63. PubMed ID: 16019758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contemporary approaches for processing and handling of radical prostactomy specimens.
Sung MT; Cheng L
Histol Histopathol; 2010 Feb; 25(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20017111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.
Bostwick DG; Montironi R
Virchows Arch; 1997 Jan; 430(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9037309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical pathology examination of radical prostatectomy specimens. Updated protocol based on the Italian TAP study.
Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R; Prezioso D; Bono AV; Ferrari P; Manganelli A; Morelli P; De Vito ML; Santinelli A; Diamanti L; Lotti T; Polito M;
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(5):3599-607. PubMed ID: 11848530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.
Samaratunga H; Montironi R; True L; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; Humphrey PA; van der Kwast T; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 20834234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Therapeutic and prognostic implications.
Epstein JI
Pathol Annu; 1991; 26 Pt 1():159-210. PubMed ID: 2014139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
