These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12647399)
1. Principles and methods of docking and ligand design. Krumrine J; Raubacher F; Brooijmans N; Kuntz I Methods Biochem Anal; 2003; 44():443-76. PubMed ID: 12647399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking. Brewerton SC Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development. Geromichalos GD J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions. Feher M Drug Discov Today; 2006 May; 11(9-10):421-8. PubMed ID: 16635804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards a MIP-based alignment and docking in computer-aided drug design. Barbany M; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H; Sanz F; Villà-Freixa J Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):585-94. PubMed ID: 15229890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. eF-seek: prediction of the functional sites of proteins by searching for similar electrostatic potential and molecular surface shape. Kinoshita K; Murakami Y; Nakamura H Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W398-402. PubMed ID: 17567616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of different electrostatic potentials on docking accuracy: a case study using DOCK5.4. Tsai KC; Wang SH; Hsiao NW; Li M; Wang B Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2008 Jun; 18(12):3509-12. PubMed ID: 18502122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BALLDock/SLICK: a new method for protein-carbohydrate docking. Kerzmann A; Fuhrmann J; Kohlbacher O; Neumann D J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18646839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided design of chiral ligands. Part III. A novel ligand for asymmetric allylation designed using computational techniques. Kozlowski MC; Waters SP; Skudlarek JW; Evans CA Org Lett; 2002 Dec; 4(25):4391-3. PubMed ID: 12465895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking. Alberts IL; Todorov NP; Dean PM J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6585-96. PubMed ID: 16220975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking. Yang JM; Chen CC Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 15048822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive docking study on the selectivity of binding of aromatic compounds to proteins. Hetényi C; Maran U; Karelson M J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1576-83. PubMed ID: 14502492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding constants with the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method. Woo HJ Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():109-20. PubMed ID: 18446284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Looger LL; Dwyer MA; Smith JJ; Hellinga HW Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):185-90. PubMed ID: 12736688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular conceptor for training in medicinal chemistry, drug design, and cheminformatics. Cohen C; Fischel O; Cohen E Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Jan; 69(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 17313460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening. Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]