BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12647467)

  • 1. Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: the view from the bench and the jury box.
    Poser S; Bornstein BH; McGorty EK
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 12647467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of jury instructions on the fusion of liability and compensatory damages.
    Wissler RL; Rector KA; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 11419378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. All anchors are not created equal: the effects of Per Diem versus lump sum requests on pain and suffering awards.
    McAuliff BD; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Apr; 34(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 19462225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separating compensatory and punitive damage award decisions by trial bifurcation.
    Shea Adams CM; Bourgeois MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16729206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Jurors' use of standards of proof in decisions about punitive damages.
    Woody WD; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):856-72. PubMed ID: 22829456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health care litigation: a common theory of noneconomic damages compensation.
    Cole CA; McCoy LA
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 10110108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.
    Bornstein BH; Golding JM; Neuschatz J; Kimbrough C; Reed K; Magyarics C; Luecht K
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 27762572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Damages for pain and suffering in tort law.
    Mendelson D
    J Law Med; 2008 May; 15(5):669-80. PubMed ID: 18575167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Road traffic accidents and secondary victimisation: the role of law professionals.
    Cotti A; Magalhães T; da Costa DP; Matos E
    Med Law; 2004; 23(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 15270469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
    Smith AC; Greene E
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidence.
    Ho Lee D; Krauss DA; Lieberman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(6):589-603. PubMed ID: 16125775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What's half a lung worth? Civil jurors' accounts of their award decision making.
    Mott NL; Hans VP; Simpson L
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):401-19. PubMed ID: 10974800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To cap or not to cap. Medical community lobbies for limits on noneconomic damages.
    Romano M
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Mar; 33(12):10. PubMed ID: 12687996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Civil liability: characterization of the demand for lawsuits against dentists.
    Zanin AA; Herrera LM; Melani RF
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Aug; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 27556556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An attributional sequence model of jury decision making in civil torts.
    Spievak ER; Bettler RF
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 19810440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedural tort reform in the United States: lessons from other nations. Part I : The background.
    Bernstein DE
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 15523770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wisconsin's caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases: where Wisconsin stands (and should stand) on "tort reform".
    Kenitz M
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2006 May; (325):9-32. PubMed ID: 17009664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Current issues in legal cases of compensation for healthcare malpractice].
    Heiner T; Barzó T
    Orv Hetil; 2014 Sep; 155(38):1510-6. PubMed ID: 25217767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedural tort reform in the United States: lessons from other nations, part II.
    Bernstein DE
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15672907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Punitive damage decision making: the decisions of citizens and trial court judges.
    Robbennolt JK
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):315-41. PubMed ID: 12061621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.