BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12647467)

  • 21. The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awards.
    Reed K; Hans VP; Rotenstein V; Helm RK; Rodriguez A; McKendall P; Reyna VF
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 38602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dentist's responsibilities with respect to a nofault motor accident compensation scheme.
    Craig PJ; Clement JG
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2012 Nov; 30 Suppl 1():40-6. PubMed ID: 23221265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictors of verdict and punitive damages in high-stakes civil litigation.
    Vinson KV; Costanzo MA; Berger DE
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):167-86. PubMed ID: 18344172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Closing the Door to Lost Earnings Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
    Levin A
    Food Drug Law J; 2015; 70(4):593-616, ii-iii. PubMed ID: 26827393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making.
    Robbennolt JK; Studebaker CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 12647465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are damages caps regressive? A study of malpractice jury verdicts in California.
    Studdert DM; Yang YT; Mello MM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; 23(4):54-67. PubMed ID: 15318567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. OBLIGATIONS TO INDEMNIFY DAMAGES INFLICTED BY MAIMING AND OTHER PERSONAL INJURIES INCLUDING DEATH: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES (REVIEW).
    Buletsa S; Zaborovskyy V; Chepys O; Badyda A; Panina Y
    Georgian Med News; 2019 Sep; (294):156-165. PubMed ID: 31687970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
    Sloan FA
    N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards.
    Spiecker SC; Worthington DL
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Aug; 27(4):437-56. PubMed ID: 12916230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation.
    Kovalerchik O; Mady LJ; Svider PF; Mauro AC; Baredes S; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Sep; 3(9):722-5. PubMed ID: 23536469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The myth of the independent judiciary.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 2007; 104(5):378-80. PubMed ID: 18018518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Be careful what you ask for: the effect of anchors on personal injury damages awards.
    Marti MW; Wissler RL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 10937314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of students' and jury panelists' decision-making in split recovery cases.
    Fox P; Wingrove T; Pfeifer C
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):358-75. PubMed ID: 21308751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice-substantial awards affirmed in medical malpractice case for death after caesarean section from delayed detection of intraperitoneal hemorrhage; in contrast to damages awarded for a motor vehicle accident, damages for medical accidents was estimated to be higher in this case on the basis of a decision on liability in claimant's favor].
    Kajitani A; Asada M; Iwai H; Kawasaki S; Kobayashi H
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 115(6):343-4. PubMed ID: 25702516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dodging a bullet. Rulings limit punitive damages, uphold arbitration.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Apr; 33(15):20. PubMed ID: 12723275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Indemnisation for medical and hospital damages. (Law no. 2002-1577 of December 30, 2002 relative to medical civil responsibility].
    Villeneuve P
    Rev Infirm; 2003 Feb; (88):45-7. PubMed ID: 12696358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From meaning to money: Translating injury into dollars.
    Hans VP; Helm RK; Reyna VF
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):95-109. PubMed ID: 29672092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pain and suffering disability index.
    Brown MM; Brown GC; Brown H; Sharma S; Wagner T; Kraushar M
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 17(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16794444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The modern Australian law of mental harm: parochialism triumphant.
    Mendelson D
    J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 16304754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.