These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12647755)

  • 1. 30 years after abortion ruling, new trends but the old debate.
    Zernike K
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 12647755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion in America.
    Shostak AB
    Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
    Rosenberg SP
    Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
    Graziano SG
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Family law I: abortion.
    Koscs ME
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion: a new round.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. After decades, Russia narrows grounds for abortions.
    Myers SL
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Aug; ():A3. PubMed ID: 14515855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to abortion pared at state level.
    Connolly C
    Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 16514735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On moral grounds, some judges are opting out of abortion cases.
    Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Sep; ():A21. PubMed ID: 16206429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N.H. approves abortion consent bill.
    Ferdinand P
    Washington Post; 2003 May; ():A5. PubMed ID: 14610776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Debate distant for many having abortions.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.