222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12648341)
1. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
John SK; Jones OM; Horseman N; Thomas P; Howell RD; Fozard JB
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 17854292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitfalls in the construction of cancer guidelines demonstrated by the analyses of colorectal referrals.
Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 16263008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study to assess the value of MMP-9 in improving the appropriateness of urgent referrals for colorectal cancer.
Ryan AV; Wilson S; Wakelam MJ; Warmington SA; Dunn JA; Hobbs RF; Martin A; Ismail T
BMC Cancer; 2006 Oct; 6():251. PubMed ID: 17059590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of a patient consultation questionnaire-based scoring system for stratification of outpatient risk of colorectal cancer.
Rai S; Ballal M; Thomas WM; Miller AS; Jameson JS; Steward WP
Br J Surg; 2008 Mar; 95(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17932877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Audit of referral practice to a fast-access breast clinic before the guaranteed 2-week wait.
Khawaja AR; Allan SM
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jan; 83(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 11212454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment.
Stanway A; Oakley A; Rademaker M; Duffill M
N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1192):U849. PubMed ID: 15107871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol.
John SK; George S; Howell RD; Primrose JN; Fozard JB
Br J Surg; 2008 Apr; 95(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 18196552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system.
Rai S; Kelly MJ
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Mar; 9(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 17298615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.
Chan TH; Goh KL
Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16412034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How relevant are ACOG and SGO guidelines for referral of adnexal mass?
Dearking AC; Aletti GD; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Sommerfield MK; Cliby WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):841-8. PubMed ID: 17906018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is anaemia relevant in the referral and diagnosis of colorectal cancer?
Masson S; Chinn DJ; Tabaqchali MA; Waddup G; Dwarakanath AD
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):736-9. PubMed ID: 17854293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in the evaluation of colorectal cancer risk.
Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 15859964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.
Debnath D; Dielehner N; Gunning KA
Postgrad Med J; 2002 Dec; 78(926):748-51. PubMed ID: 12509694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Referral and diagnostic process in suspected colorectal cancer needs to be improved to achieve two week target.
Riesewyk C; Hawyard C; Enser V; Northover J
BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1527. PubMed ID: 11118186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes.
Neal RD; Allgar VL; Ali N; Leese B; Heywood P; Proctor G; Evans J
Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Mar; 57(536):212-9. PubMed ID: 17359608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
