BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12648764)

  • 1. Differential tissue shrinkage and compression in the z-axis: implications for optical disector counting in vibratome-, plastic- and cryosections.
    Gardella D; Hatton WJ; Rind HB; Rosen GD; von Bartheld CS
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 12648764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical disector counting in cryosections and vibratome sections underestimates particle numbers: effects of tissue quality.
    Ward TS; Rosen GD; von Bartheld CS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2008 Jan; 71(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 17868132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two distinct events, section compression and loss of particles ("lost caps"), contribute to z-axis distortion and bias in optical disector counting.
    Baryshnikova LM; Von Bohlen Und Halbach O; Kaplan S; Von Bartheld CS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Sep; 69(9):738-56. PubMed ID: 16845675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distribution of Particles in the Z-axis of Tissue Sections: Relevance for Counting Methods.
    von Bartheld CS
    Neuroquantology; 2012; 10(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 23874137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of differential shrinkage in frozen brain sections and its implications for the use of guard zones in stereology.
    Carlo CN; Stevens CF
    J Comp Neurol; 2011 Oct; 519(14):2803-10. PubMed ID: 21491430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thick methacrylate sections devoid of lost caps simplify stereological quantifications based on the optical fractionator design.
    Hasselholt S; Lykkesfeldt J; Overgaard Larsen J
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Dec; 298(12):2141-50. PubMed ID: 26370738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of the chick embryo: calibration of the optical disector counting method reveals systematic bias.
    Hatton WJ; von Bartheld CS
    J Comp Neurol; 1999 Jun; 409(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 10379913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tissue shrinkage and unbiased stereological estimation of particle number and size.
    Dorph-Petersen KA; Nyengaard JR; Gundersen HJ
    J Microsc; 2001 Dec; 204(Pt 3):232-46. PubMed ID: 11903800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there section deformation resulting in differential change of nuclear numerical densities along the z axis of thick methacrylate or paraffin sections?
    Xu W; Guo Y; Xiang Y; Yang ZW
    Microsc Res Tech; 2019 Sep; 82(9):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 31218785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for physical disector analyses of numbers and mean volumes of immunohistochemically labeled cells in paraffin sections.
    Hofmann I; Kemter E; Fiedler S; Theobalt N; Fonteyne L; Wolf E; Wanke R; Blutke A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Sep; 361():109272. PubMed ID: 34216707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Counting cells in sectioned material: a suite of techniques, tools, and tips.
    Williams RW; von Bartheld CS; Rosen GD
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2003 Nov; Chapter 1():Unit 1.11. PubMed ID: 18428578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New strategies for embedding, orientation and sectioning of small brain specimens enable direct correlation to MR-images, brain atlases, or use of unbiased stereology.
    Bjarkam CR; Pedersen M; Sørensen JC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2001 Jul; 108(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 11478974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Counting particles in tissue sections: choices of methods and importance of calibration to minimize biases.
    von Bartheld C
    Histol Histopathol; 2002 Apr; 17(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 11962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On counting and counting errors.
    Guillery RW
    J Comp Neurol; 2002 May; 447(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11967890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Requirements for obtaining unbiased estimates of neuronal numbers in frozen sections.
    Messina A; Sangster CL; Morrison WA; Galea MP
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Apr; 97(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 10788667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of the physical disector method for estimating neuron number.
    Popken GJ; Farel PB
    J Neurobiol; 1996 Oct; 31(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 8885198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical considerations for the use of the optical disector in estimating neuronal number.
    Harding AJ; Halliday GM; Cullen K
    J Neurosci Methods; 1994 Jan; 51(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8189753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total number of neurons in the neostriatal, pallidal, subthalamic, and substantia nigral nuclei of the rat basal ganglia: a stereological study using the cavalieri and optical disector methods.
    Oorschot DE
    J Comp Neurol; 1996 Mar; 366(4):580-99. PubMed ID: 8833111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional counting: an accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material.
    Williams RW; Rakic P
    J Comp Neurol; 1988 Dec; 278(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 3216047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aspects of the quantitative analysis of neurons in the cerebral cortex.
    Skoglund TS; Pascher R; Berthold CH
    J Neurosci Methods; 1996 Dec; 70(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 9007760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.