157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12648789)
21. Improved conformality and decreased toxicity with intraoperative computer-optimized transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Marion C; Sim S; Cohen G; Ben-Porat L; Silvern D; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(4):956-63. PubMed ID: 12605973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intraoperative dosimetric representation of the real-time ultrasound-guided prostate implant.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Lo YC
Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 10798807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Phase II prospective study of the use of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for the treatment of favorable stage prostate cancer: a feasibility report.
Martinez AA; Pataki I; Edmundson G; Sebastian E; Brabbins D; Gustafson G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 11163498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Iodine-125 transperineal prostate brachytherapy with preplanning technique: pre and post-implant dosimetry results analysis].
Simonian-Sauve M; Smart C; Mailleux H; Rosello R; Bladou F; Salem N
Cancer Radiother; 2003 Apr; 7(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 12719038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prostate permanent implant brachytherapy with BARC I-125 Ocu-Prosta seeds.
Palled SR; Saminathan S; Pasha T; Naveen T; Ganesh KM; Lokesh V
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 34121675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing CTVs for permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Oton CA; Blanco L; Oton LF; Moral S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2015 May; 17(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 25351173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Late urinary side effects 10 years after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: population-based results from a multiphysician practice treating with a standardized protocol and uniform dosimetric goals.
Keyes M; Miller S; Pickles T; Halperin R; Kwan W; Lapointe V; McKenzie M; Spadinger I; Pai H; Chan EK; Morris WJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 25151536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of transrectal ultrasound- and computed tomography-based seed localization on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
Chew MS; Xue J; Houser C; Misic V; Cao J; Cornwell T; Handler J; Yu Y; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(2):255-264. PubMed ID: 19213606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biochemical outcomes after prostate brachytherapy with 5-year minimal follow-up: importance of patient selection and implant quality.
Kollmeier MA; Stock RG; Stone N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 14529768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of post-plan dosimetry using TRUS and CT after transperineal prostate seed implant.
Helmick R; Tarver R; Chan R; Caldwell S
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 12521076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants.
Haworth A; Ebert M; St Clair S; Carey BM; Flynn A; Bottomley DM; Duchesne GM; Joseph D; Ash D
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 15893269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Robert Lee W; Deguzman AF; McMullen KP; McCullough DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15629593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric comparison of pre-planned and or-planned prostate seed brachytherapy.
Wilkinson DA; Lee EJ; Ciezki JP; Mohan DS; Zippe C; Angermeier K; Ulchaker J; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Nov; 48(4):1241-4. PubMed ID: 11072184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Planning based on postneedle volume with early dosimetric assessment is beneficial for Cesium-131 permanent prostate seed implantation.
Smith RP; Beriwal S; Komanduri K; Gibbons E; Benoit R
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 18599357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An innovative dosimetric model for formulating a semi-analytical solution for the activity-volume relationship in prostate implants.
Lee PC; Parks EK; Moran BJ
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 14684189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
