BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12648796)

  • 21. The influence of the IAEA standard holder on dose evaluated from TLD samples.
    Izewska J; Novotny J; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 8778826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mailed TL dosimetry programme for machine output check and clinical application in the EORTC radiotherapy group.
    Hansson U; Johansson KA; Horiot JC; Bernier J
    Radiother Oncol; 1993 Nov; 29(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 8310158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the methodology for dosimetry audit of heterogeneity corrections and small MLC-shaped fields: Results of IAEA multi-center studies.
    Izewska J; Wesolowska P; Azangwe G; Followill DS; Thwaites DI; Arib M; Stefanic A; Viegas C; Suming L; Ekendahl D; Bulski W; Georg D
    Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):909-16. PubMed ID: 26934916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons.
    Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Development of external quality control protocol for CyberKnife beams dosimetry: preliminary tests multicentre].
    Guinement L; Marchesi V; Veres A; Lacornerie T; Buchheit I; Peiffert D
    Cancer Radiother; 2013; 17(4):288-96. PubMed ID: 23871458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical impact of dosimetry quality assurance programmes assessed by radiobiological modelling of data from the thermoluminescent dosimetry study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
    Bentzen SM; Bernier J; Davis JB; Horiot JC; Garavaglia G; Chavaudra J; Johansson KA; Bolla M
    Eur J Cancer; 2000 Mar; 36(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 10738126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Kirby TH; Hanson WF; Johnston DA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1427-33. PubMed ID: 1461205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of in vivo thermoluminescent dosimeters in the quality assurance programme for the START breast fractionation trial.
    Venables K; Miles EA; Aird EG; Hoskin PJ;
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jun; 71(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 15172146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015.
    Muhammad W; Ullah A; Mahmood K; Matiullah
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016; 17(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 27538269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monte Carlo simulation of correction factors for IAEA TLD holders.
    Hultqvist M; Fernández-Varea JM; Izewska J
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(6):N161-6. PubMed ID: 20197601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit.
    Gershkevitsh E; Pesznyak C; Petrovic B; Grezdo J; Chelminski K; do Carmo Lopes M; Izewska J; Van Dyk J
    Acta Oncol; 2014 May; 53(5):628-36. PubMed ID: 24164104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries.
    Izewska J; Andreo P; Vatnitsky S; Shortt KR
    Radiother Oncol; 2003 Oct; 69(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 14597361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The 1998 Australian external beam radiotherapy survey and IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audit.
    Huntley R; Izewska J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10921198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimum parameters of TLD100 powder used for radiotherapy beams calibration check.
    Arib M; Yaich A; Messadi A; Dari F
    Med Dosim; 2006; 31(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16905448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit service and high precision measurements for radiotherapy level dosimetry. International Atomic Energy Agency/World Health Organization.
    Izewska J; Bera P; Vatnitsky S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):387-92. PubMed ID: 12382774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Design and implementation of a "cheese" phantom-based Tomotherapy TLD dose intercomparison.
    Schiefer H; Buchauer K; Heinze S; Henke G; Plasswilm L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 Nov; 191(11):855-61. PubMed ID: 26087907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The quality of dental radiography in the Czech Republic--results of a TLD and film postal audit.
    Novák L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):155-8. PubMed ID: 16782748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assurance of serial tomotherapy for head and neck patient treatments.
    Low DA; Chao KS; Mutic S; Gerber RL; Perez CA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Oct; 42(3):681-92. PubMed ID: 9806530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.