These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12649708)

  • 1. Interocclusal clearance during speech and in mandibular rest position. A comparison between different measuring methods.
    Meier B; Luck O; Harzer W
    J Orofac Orthop; 2003 Mar; 64(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 12649708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of denture fabrication and wear on closest speaking space and interocclusal distance during deglutition.
    de Souza RF; Marra J; Pero AC; Compagnoni MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 17618921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of the speech envelope and interocclusal dimensions in dentate subjects.
    Burnett CA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 7748449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preliminary study on the effect of occlusal vertical dimension increase on mandibular postural rest position.
    Gross MD; Ormianer Z
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 7916886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of cephalometric study of the rest position to diagnosis of reversed occlusion cases].
    Suzuki Y
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 16(1):189-215. PubMed ID: 2637256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mandibular speech envelope in subjects with and without incisal tooth wear.
    Burnett CA; Clifford TJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 10815604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new clinical method for evaluating the closest speaking space in dentulous and edentulous subjects: a pilot study.
    Rizzatti A; Ceruti P; Mussano F; Erovigni F; Preti G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 17580457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular incisor position for English consonant sounds.
    Burnett CA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 10635195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
    Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anteroposterior and mediolateral variability of the closest speaking space.
    Rivera-Morales WC; Mohl ND
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 2133386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric evaluation of condylar and mandibular growth modification: a review.
    Shen G; Darendeliler MA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16420269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Interocclusal clearance and changes in occlusal position in dentate and edentulous jaws. 1].
    Ott RW
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Nov; 46(11):762-5. PubMed ID: 1817882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of new dentures on interocclusal distance during speech.
    Rodrigues Garcia RC; Oliveira VM; Del Bel Cury AA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 14651241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability of mandibular position in continuous vowel phonation.
    Moriya N; Morimoto S; Ohkawa S; Nagasawa T; Tsuru H
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 2088371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
    Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Sternocleidomastoid-mandibular interaction and the rest position].
    Chersoni S
    Minerva Stomatol; 1997 Apr; 46(4):147-53. PubMed ID: 9221316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.