521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12649994)
1. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
Ashby M; Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
Brindisi TJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.
Cantor NL; Thomas GC
Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.
Dewar MA
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8133230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
Stewart C
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.
Elliott SJ
Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment.
Gasner MR
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11():499-520. PubMed ID: 16047426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
Goldmeier KE
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Culture of life" politics at the bedside--the case of Terri Schiavo.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(16):1710-5. PubMed ID: 15784657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Terminal care, advanced directives, patient autonomy: regulation should eliminate inconsistencies in the current legal status].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2008 Apr; 61(4):206-9. PubMed ID: 18481702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision-Making: At the End of Life and the Provision of Pretreatment Advice.
Pope TM; Richards BJ
J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Sep; 12(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 26160603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Jun; (208):9-75. PubMed ID: 10158433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Twenty-five years after Quinlan: a review of the jurisprudence of death and dying.
Cantor NL
J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):182-96. PubMed ID: 11508195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The future of the "right to die".
Misbin RI
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 8133234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Hargrove MD
J La State Med Soc; 1994 Jan; 146(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 8169496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The right to live and the right to die].
Zeeh J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Apr; 156(6):45-8; quiz 49-50. PubMed ID: 24919297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Suing health care providers for saving lives. Liability for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment.
Rodriguez KF
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):1-66. PubMed ID: 10230150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]