184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12650033)
1. [Value of spiral CT and MRI (1.5 T) in preoperative diagnosis of tumors of the head of the pancreas].
Pauls S; Sokiranski R; Schwarz M; Rieber A; Möller P; Brambs HJ
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 12650033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [MRI in the evaluation of peripancreatic vessel invasion and resectability of pancreatic carcinoma].
Wang DQ; Zeng MS; Jin DY; Lou WH; Ji Y; Rao SX; Shi X; Chen CZ; Li RC
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 29(11):846-9. PubMed ID: 18396644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: at what stage are we?
Gorelick AB; Scheiman JM; Fendrick AM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Oct; 93(10):1995-6. PubMed ID: 9772077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma: tendency for understaging.
Bley TA; Uhl M; Simon P; Mayerle J; Ghanem NA; Geml B; Saueressig U; Langer M
In Vivo; 2005; 19(6):983-7. PubMed ID: 16277011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison between spiral x-ray computed tomography and endosonography in the diagnosis and staging of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Clinical preliminary study].
Dufour B; Zins M; Vilgrain V; Levy P; Bernades P; Menu Y
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1997; 21(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 9161478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study of preoperative MRI staging of tongue carcinoma in relation to pathological findings].
Zeng H; Liang CH; Zhou ZG; Zheng JH; Zeng QX
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 23(8):841-3. PubMed ID: 12919914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.
Dinter DJ; Hofheinz RD; Hartel M; Kaehler GF; Neff W; Diehl SJ
Onkologie; 2008 May; 31(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 18497511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus helical CT in diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Jemaa Y; Houissa F; Trabelsi S; Moussa A; Belhouchet H; Mouelhi L; Bouraoui M; Bouzaidi S; Debbeche R; Ben Yedder J; Salem M; Najjar T
Tunis Med; 2008 Apr; 86(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 19476136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of bladder cancer: comparison with computed tomography (CT) and transurethral ultrasonography (US).
Nishimura K; Hida S; Nishio Y; Ohishi K; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Nishibuchi S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1988 Sep; 18(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 3045372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of the peripancreatic vasculature in pancreas carcinoma].
Helmreich F; Schniewind B; Biederer J; Heller M; Reuter M
Rofo; 2004 Feb; 176(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 14872379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification and staging of pancreatic tumours using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Ramsay D; Marshall M; Song S; Zimmerman M; Edmunds S; Yusoff I; Cullingford G; Fletcher D; Mendelson R
Australas Radiol; 2004 Jun; 48(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 15230749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Sun Y; Mao YP; Ma J; Huang Y; Tang LL; Wang Y; Liu LZ; Lu TX
Ai Zheng; 2007 Feb; 26(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 17298745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions - prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreiländertreffen 2008, Davos.
Seitz K; Strobel D; Bernatik T; Blank W; Friedrich-Rust M; Herbay Av; Dietrich CF; Strunk H; Kratzer W; Schuler A
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Aug; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 19688670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with vulva carcinoma?
Bipat S; Fransen GA; Spijkerboer AM; van der Velden J; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH; Stoker J
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):1001-6. PubMed ID: 16859737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography on the TNM staging of early cancer in Barrett's esophagus.
Pech O; May A; Günter E; Gossner L; Ell C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 101(10):2223-9. PubMed ID: 17032186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.
Gipponi M; Bassetti C; Canavese G; Catturich A; Di Somma C; Vecchio C; Nicolò G; Schenone F; Tomei D; Cafiero F
J Surg Oncol; 2004 Mar; 85(3):102-11. PubMed ID: 14991881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
