184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12650035)
21. Utilization of Carbon Dioxide Angiography and Percutaneous Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis.
Hasjim BJ; Fujitani RM; Chen SL; Donayre C; Kuo IJ; Raza A; Reddy U; Ichii H; Kabutey NK
Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 May; 65():10-16. PubMed ID: 31712187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usefulness of 3-dimensional reconstructed images of renal arteries using rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Endo H; Shimizu T; Kodama Y; Miyasaka K
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2046-8. PubMed ID: 11956435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Carbon dioxide angiography of the transplanted kidney: technical considerations and imaging findings.
Moresco KP; Patel NH; Namyslowski Y; Shah H; Johnson MS; Trerotola SO
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1271-6. PubMed ID: 9798859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Superior sensitivity of angiographic detection of arteriovenous fistula after biopsy in a renal allograft with CO2 compared with iodinated contrast medium.
Cheng PM; Van Allan RJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1963-6. PubMed ID: 17185694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
De Cobelli F; Venturini M; Vanzulli A; Sironi S; Salvioni M; Angeli E; Scifo P; Garancini MP; Quartagno R; Bianchi G; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 10671583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lower limb angiography: a prospective study comparing carbon dioxide with iodinated contrast material in 30 patients.
Rolland Y; Duvauferrier R; Lucas A; Gourlay C; Morcet N; Rambeau M; Chaperon J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 9694446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Fain SB; King BF; Breen JF; Kruger DG; Riederer SJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 11161166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography for renal artery stent placement.
Caridi JG; Stavropoulos SW; Hawkins IF
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 May; 10(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 10357491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The spectrum of the findings of arterial digital subtraction angiography in patients following kidney transplantation].
Grützner G; Bach D; Flür P; Kniemeyer HW; Mödder U
Rofo; 1994 Jun; 160(6):531-7. PubMed ID: 8011999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gadolinium as a nonnephrotoxic contrast agent for catheter-based arteriographic evaluation of renal arteries in patients with azotemia.
Ailawadi G; Stanley JC; Williams DM; Dimick JB; Henke PK; Upchurch GR
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):346-52. PubMed ID: 12563205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries.
Holland GA; Dougherty L; Carpenter JP; Golden MA; Gilfeather M; Slossman F; Schnall MD; Axel L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 8610584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CO2 microbubble contrast enhancement in x-ray angiography.
Kariya S; Komemushi A; Nakatani M; Yoshida R; Sawada S; Tanigawa N
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 22981730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective study of helical computed tomography angiography versus angiography for the detection of renal artery stenoses in hypertensive patients.
Elkohen M; Beregi JP; Deklunder G; Artaud D; Mounier-Vehier C; Carre AG
J Hypertens; 1996 Apr; 14(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8761904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of CO2 angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO2 versus iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model.
Moresco KP; Patel N; Johnson MS; Trobridge D; Bergan KA; Lalka SG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 10787201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
Völk M; Strotzer M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Seitz J; Feuerbach S; Link J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1583-8. PubMed ID: 10845486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Carbon dioxide angiography in lower limbs: a prospective comparative study with selective iodinated contrast angiography.
Ho CF; Chern MS; Wu MH; Wu HM; Lin WC; Chang CY; Chen MC; Chou TY
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2003 Dec; 19(12):599-607. PubMed ID: 14719557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CO2 digital angiography: a safer contrast agent for renal vascular imaging?
Hawkins IF; Wilcox CS; Kerns SR; Sabatelli FW
Am J Kidney Dis; 1994 Oct; 24(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 7942829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of main renal artery stenosis using phase-contrast cine MR angiography.
Silverman JM; Friedman ML; Van Allan RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 8615257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.
Kaatee R; Beek FJ; de Lange EE; van Leeuwen MS; Smits HF; van der Ven PJ; Beutler JJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 9314973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
