184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12650035)
41. Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
Thornton MJ; Thornton F; O'Callaghan J; Varghese JC; O'Brien E; Walshe J; Lee MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1279-83. PubMed ID: 10541105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of severe transplant renal artery stenosis with Doppler sonography.
Li JC; Ji ZG; Cai S; Jiang YX; Dai Q; Zhang JX
J Clin Ultrasound; 2005; 33(6):261-9. PubMed ID: 16134153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Carbon dioxide (CO2) as contrast medium for the new installation and follow-up of a TIPS].
Wilhelm K; Textor J; Strunk H; Brensing KA; Schüller H; Schild H
Rofo; 1997 Mar; 166(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 9156596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
Loubeyre P; Revel D; Garcia P; Delignette A; Canet E; Chirossel P; Genin G; Amiel M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 8141006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.
Hahn U; Miller S; Nägele T; Schick F; Erdtmann B; Duda S; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 10350280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Law YM; Tay KH; Gan YU; Cheah FK; Tan BS
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. High-pitch carbon dioxide contrasted CT angiography: pilot study.
Penzkofer T; Slebocki K; Grommes J; Bruners P; Isfort P; Schmitz-Rode T; Langer S; Kuhl CK; Mahnken AH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2014 Apr; 37(2):362-70. PubMed ID: 24452319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography.
Wasser MN; Westenberg J; van der Hulst VP; van Baalen J; van Bockel JH; van Erkel AR; Pattynama PM
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 9015052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors using multirow detector computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative findings.
Hänninen EL; Denecke T; Stelter L; Pech M; Podrabsky P; Pratschke J; Ricke J; Schindler R; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Tullius SG
Transpl Int; 2005 Oct; 18(10):1134-41. PubMed ID: 16162099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Duplex Doppler sonography of transplant renal artery stenosis.
de Morais RH; Muglia VF; Mamere AE; Garcia Pisi T; Saber LT; Muglia VA; Elias J; Piccinato CE; Trad CS
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003; 31(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 12594798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences.
Loubeyre P; Trolliet P; Cahen R; Grozel F; Labeeuw M; Minh VA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):489-94. PubMed ID: 8686634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis.
Beregi JP; Elkohen M; Deklunder G; Artaud D; Coullet JM; Wattinne L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):495-501. PubMed ID: 8686635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Carbon dioxide angiography. A new injection system].
Nicolini A; Lovaria A; Meregaglia D; Palatresi S
Radiol Med; 2000; 99(1-2):51-5. PubMed ID: 10803187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transplanted renal artery: detection of stenosis with color Doppler US.
Loubeyre P; Abidi H; Cahen R; Tran Minh VA
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):661-5. PubMed ID: 9169685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of iomeprol in renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
Simonetti G; Guazzaroni M; Carpanese L; Canalis GC; Urigo F
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S73-6. PubMed ID: 8020522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. CO2 angiography--a technique for vascular imaging in renal allograft dysfunction.
Kuo PC; Petersen J; Semba C; Alfrey EJ; Dafoe DC
Transplantation; 1996 Feb; 61(4):652-4. PubMed ID: 8610396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A Novel Bubble-Mixture Method to Improve Dynamic Images in Carbon Dioxide Angiography.
Chang TI; Chan CY; Su SK; Wang SS; Wu IH
J Endovasc Ther; 2015 Aug; 22(4):564-7. PubMed ID: 26045463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy with carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material in the imaging of hemodialysis access fistulas.
Ehrman KO; Taber TE; Gaylord GM; Brown PB; Hage JP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(5):771-5. PubMed ID: 8000128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors].
Steinborn M; Wintersperger BJ; Heck A; Theodorakis J; Waggershauser T; Hillebrand GF; Reiser M
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 10598168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
