291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12651384)
41. Factors affecting transient gene expression in electroporated black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) protoplasts.
Tautorus TE; Bekkaoui F; Pilon M; Datla RS; Crosby WL; Fowke LC; Dunstan DI
Theor Appl Genet; 1989 Oct; 78(4):531-6. PubMed ID: 24225681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field.
Niinemets U; Díaz-Espejo A; Flexas J; Galmés J; Warren CR
J Exp Bot; 2009; 60(8):2271-82. PubMed ID: 19305021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Weak vertical canopy gradients of photosynthetic capacities and stomatal responses in a fertile Norway spruce stand.
Tarvainen L; Wallin G; Uddling J
Oecologia; 2013 Dec; 173(4):1179-89. PubMed ID: 23797410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The influence of nitrogen and phosphorus supply and genotype on mesophyll conductance limitations to photosynthesis in Pinus radiata.
Bown HE; Watt MS; Mason EG; Clinton PW; Whitehead D
Tree Physiol; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1143-51. PubMed ID: 19617215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada.
Steele SJ; Gower ST; Vogel JG; Norman JM
Tree Physiol; 1997; 17(8_9):577-587. PubMed ID: 14759831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Will changes in root-zone temperature in boreal spring affect recovery of photosynthesis in Picea mariana and Populus tremuloides in a future climate?
Fréchette E; Ensminger I; Bergeron Y; Gessler A; Berninger F
Tree Physiol; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1204-16. PubMed ID: 22021010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Modeling topographic effects on net ecosystem productivity of boreal black spruce forests.
Grant RF
Tree Physiol; 2004 Jan; 24(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 14652210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands.
Helmisaari HS; Derome J; Nöjd P; Kukkola M
Tree Physiol; 2007 Oct; 27(10):1493-504. PubMed ID: 17669739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effects of hydraulic architecture and spatial variation in light on mean stomatal conductance of tree branches and crowns.
Ewers BE; Oren R; Kim HS; Bohrer G; Lai CT
Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Apr; 30(4):483-96. PubMed ID: 17324234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Canopy stomatal conductance following drought, disturbance, and death in an upland oak/pine forest of the new jersey pine barrens, USA.
Schäfer KV
Front Plant Sci; 2011; 2():15. PubMed ID: 22639580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Investigating light-use efficiency across a jack pine chronosequence during dry and wet years.
Chasmer L; McCaughey H; Barr A; Black A; Shashkov A; Treitz P; Zha T
Tree Physiol; 2008 Sep; 28(9):1395-406. PubMed ID: 18595852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Photosynthesis and light-use efficiency by plants in a Canadian boreal forest ecosystem.
Whitehead D; Gower ST
Tree Physiol; 2001 Aug; 21(12-13):925-9. PubMed ID: 11498339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Ectomycorrhizal root tips in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in boreal forests.
Helmisaari HS; Ostonen I; Lõhmus K; Derome J; Lindroos AJ; Merilä P; Nöjd P
Tree Physiol; 2009 Mar; 29(3):445-56. PubMed ID: 19203968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impacts of prescribed fire on Pinus rigida Mill. in upland forests of the Atlantic Coastal Plain.
Carlo NJ; Renninger HJ; Clark KL; Schäfer KV
Tree Physiol; 2016 Aug; 36(8):967-82. PubMed ID: 27259637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Genecological variation corresponding to Forest Ecosystem Classification vegetation and soil types for jack pine and black spruce from northwestern Ontario.
Parker WH; Van Niejenhuis A; Ward J
Environ Monit Assess; 1996 Jan; 39(1-3):589-99. PubMed ID: 24198032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Why does needle photosynthesis decline with tree height in Norway spruce?
Räim O; Kaurilind E; Hallik L; Merilo E
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2012 Mar; 14(2):306-14. PubMed ID: 21974690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of three approaches to modeling leaf gas exchange in annually drought-stressed ponderosa pine forests.
Misson L; Panek JA; Goldstein AH
Tree Physiol; 2004 May; 24(5):529-41. PubMed ID: 14996657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cross-scale controls on carbon emissions from boreal forest megafires.
Walker XJ; Rogers BM; Baltzer JL; Cumming SG; Day NJ; Goetz SJ; Johnstone JF; Schuur EAG; Turetsky MR; Mack MC
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Sep; 24(9):4251-4265. PubMed ID: 29697169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Photosynthetic capacity of red spruce during winter.
Schaberg PG; Shane JB; Cali PF; Donnelly JR; Strimbeck GR
Tree Physiol; 1998 Apr; 18(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 12651382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Leaf traits in relation to crown development, light interception and growth of elite families of loblolly and slash pine.
Chmura DJ; Tjoelker MG
Tree Physiol; 2008 May; 28(5):729-42. PubMed ID: 18316305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
