These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12652031)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine with anterior interbody fusion on the different locations of the bone grafts.
    Cheng CK; Chen CS; Liu CL
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 12652031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite-element analysis for lumbar interbody fusion under axial loading.
    Lee KK; Teo EC; Fuss FK; Vanneuville V; Qiu TX; Ng HW; Yang K; Sabitzer RJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15000370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 16356613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
    Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis.
    Chiang MF; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Shih SL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E682-9. PubMed ID: 16946641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Chen WJ; Hung C
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 18760654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of the spondylolysis in lumbar spine.
    Wang JP; Zhong ZC; Cheng CK; Chen CS; Yu CH; Chang TK; Wei SH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 17075165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.
    Ivanov AA; Kiapour A; Ebraheim NA; Goel V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E162-9. PubMed ID: 19247155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease? A finite element study.
    Tang S; Rebholz BJ
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 21311928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.