134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12652177)
21. Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity.
Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Berg M; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2055-63. PubMed ID: 9826856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
Chen S; Chen K; Tao Q; Zheng L; Shen F; Wu S; Fan J; Xu G; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhang S;
Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of automatic threshold tracking on pulse generator longevity in patients with different chronic stimulation thresholds.
Simeon L; Duru F; Fluri M; Jenzer HR; Rahn M; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1788-91. PubMed ID: 11139924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Autocapture enhancements: unipolar and bipolar lead compatibility and bipolar pacing capability on bipolar leads.
Binner L; Messenger J; Sperzel J; Bondke H; Vandekerckhove Y; Poore J; Scheiner J; Berkhof M; Park E; Holmström N; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):221-4. PubMed ID: 12687816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chronic ventricular pacing using an output amplitude of 1.0 volt.
Schwaab B; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2171-8. PubMed ID: 9309740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The intraoperative measured stimulation impedance of pacemaker electrodes is not a predictor for their longevity].
Schuchert A; Schmidt W; Jakob M; Jung W; Karmann W; Kreuzer J; Staedt U; Stertmann WA; Treese N; Meinertz T
Z Kardiol; 1998 Jan; 87(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9531696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group].
Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Aug; 121(34-35):1046-9. PubMed ID: 8829905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [A new cardiac pacemaker stimulation technology (autocapture) allows, with unchanged life expectancy, reduction of generator size by half].
Antretter H; Bonatti J; Cottogni M; Hangler H; Müller LC; Mair P; Dapunt OE
Acta Med Austriaca; 1996; 23(5):159-64. PubMed ID: 9082745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term experience with AutoCapture-controlled epicardial pacing in children.
Tomaske M; Harpes P; Pretre R; Dodge-Khatami A; Bauersfeld U
Europace; 2007 Aug; 9(8):645-50. PubMed ID: 17630391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems.
Duru F; Bauersfeld U; Schüller H; Candinas R
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 4(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 11046190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of high versus normal impedance ventricular leads on pacemaker generator longevity.
Berger T; Roithinger FX; Antretter H; Hangler H; Pachinger O; Hintringer F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Nov; 26(11):2116-20. PubMed ID: 14622313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The safety and efficacy of chronic ventricular pacing at 1.6 volts using a steroid eluting lead.
Stamato NJ; O'Toole MF; Fetter JG; Enger EL
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Mar; 15(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 1372716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automatic management of atrial and ventricular stimulation in a contemporary unselected population of pacemaker recipients: the ESSENTIAL Registry.
Biffi M; Bertini M; Saporito D; Belotti G; Quartieri F; Piancastelli M; Pucci A; Boggian G; Mazzocca GF; Giorgi D; Diotallevi P; Diemberger I; Martignani C; Pancaldi S; Ziacchi M; Marcantoni L; Toselli T; Attala S; Iori M; Bottoni N; Argnani S; Tomasi C; Sassone B; Boriani G
Europace; 2016 Oct; 18(10):1551-1560. PubMed ID: 27305923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Atrial evoked response integral for automatic capture verification in atrial pacing.
Boriani G; Biffi M; Cameron D; Datteri S; Snell J; Holmström N; Park E; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):248-52. PubMed ID: 12687822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unexpected loss of bipolar pacing with implanted dual chamber pacemakers.
Guo GB; Chen MC; Wang CC; Chang KC; Fu M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 10666747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dual chamber cardiac pacing in children: Single chamber pacing dual chamber sensing cardiac pacemaker or dual chamber pacing and sensing cardiac pacemaker?
Bostan OM; Celiker A; Karagöz T; Ozer S; Ozme S
Pediatr Int; 2002 Dec; 44(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 12421261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Autocapture compatibility in patients with the MembraneEX lead and Affinity pulse generators.
Schuchert A; Voitk J; Liu B; Kolk R; Stammwitz E; Beiras J;
Europace; 2001 Oct; 3(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 11678393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Compatibility of automatic threshold tracking pacemakers with previously implanted pacing leads in children.
Kucukosmanoglu O; Celiker A; Ozer S; Karagoz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 25(11):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12494622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance of a ventricular automatic-capture algorithm in a wide clinical setting.
Pecora D; Morandi F; Liccardo M; Pepi P; Orazi S; Caico SI; Scaccia A; Bizeau O; Citerne O; Raciti G; Del Giudice G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Dec; 31(12):1546-53. PubMed ID: 19067806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
