238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12652257)
1. Use of the implantable loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope.
Krahn AD; Klein GJ; Yee R; Skanes AC
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Feb; 51(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 12652257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of monitoring strategies in patients with unexplained syncope--role of the external and implantable loop recorder.
Krahn AD; Klein GJ; Yee R; Skanes AC
Clin Auton Res; 2004 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():55-61. PubMed ID: 15480931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insertable loop recorder use for detection of intermittent arrhythmias.
Krahn AD; Klein GJ; Skanes AC; Yee R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 15125724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the implantable loop recorder in evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope.
Krahn AD; Klein GJ; Skanes AC; Yee R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S70-3. PubMed ID: 12950523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recurrent unexplained syncope: diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Krahn AD; Klein GJ; Yee R
Can J Cardiol; 1996 Oct; 12(10):989-94. PubMed ID: 9191491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Efficacy of implantable loop recorders in establishing symptom-rhythm correlation in patients with unexplained syncope].
Liu ZM; Liu ZP; Guo T
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1009-12. PubMed ID: 17288766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are implantable loop recorders useful in detecting arrhythmias in children with unexplained syncope?
Al Dhahri KN; Potts JE; Chiu CC; Hamilton RM; Sanatani S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Nov; 32(11):1422-7. PubMed ID: 19694968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The utility of implantable loop recorders for diagnosing unexplained syncope in 100 consecutive patients: five-year, single-center experience.
Inamdar V; Mehta S; Juang G; Cohen T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 18(7):313-5. PubMed ID: 16816436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implantable loop recorder for recurrent syncope: influence of cardiac conduction abnormalities showing up on resting electrocardiogram and of underlying cardiac disease on follow-up developments.
Pierre B; Fauchier L; Breard G; Marie O; Poret P; Babuty D
Europace; 2008 Apr; 10(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 18325892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Syncope and a negative electrophysiological study. The usefulness of an implantable Holter monitor for the diagnosis of ventricular arrhythmias].
Belchí Navarro J; Quesada Dorador A; Atienza Fernández F; Villalba Caballero SJ; Roda Nicolás J; de Velasco Ramí JA
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1999 Dec; 52(12):1151-3. PubMed ID: 10659662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ECG monitoring in syncope.
Ruwald MH; Zareba W
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 56(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24215752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial clinical experience with implantable loop recorders.
Mieszczanska H; Ibrahim B; Cohen TJ
J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 13(12):802-4. PubMed ID: 11731693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using the net benefit regression framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of "community acquired" syncope.
Hoch JS; Rockx MA; Krahn AD
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jun; 6():68. PubMed ID: 16756680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implantable loop recorder for recurrent syncopes.
Babuty D; Pierre B; Grimard C; Zannad N; Marie O; Fauchier L
Minerva Med; 2009 Aug; 100(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 19749683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of tilt table testing in patients with suspected arrhythmic syncope and negative electrophysiologic study.
García-Civera R; Ruiz-Granell R; Morell-Cabedo S; Sanjuan-Mañez R; Ferrero A; Martínez-Brotons A; Roselló A; Botella S; Llacer A
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 16(9):938-42. PubMed ID: 16174011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope.
Sivakumaran S; Krahn AD; Klein GJ; Finan J; Yee R; Renner S; Skanes AC
Am J Med; 2003 Jul; 115(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12867227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Implantable loop recorders in evaluation of syncope].
Christiansen CS; Gjesdal K
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1657-9. PubMed ID: 17571107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the implantable loop recorder in children and adolescents.
Gass M; Apitz C; Salehi-Gilani S; Ziemer G; Hofbeck M
Cardiol Young; 2006 Dec; 16(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 17116271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomised prospective comparison of three protocols for head-up tilt testing and carotid sinus massage.
Farwell DJ; Sulke AN
Int J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 105(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 16019088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External loop recorders: determinants of diagnostic yield in patients with syncope.
Gula LJ; Krahn AD; Massel D; Skanes A; Yee R; Klein GJ
Am Heart J; 2004 Apr; 147(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 15077079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
