26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1265231)
1. Place of ultrasound and radiography in obstetrics.
Meire HB; Farrant P; Wilkins RA
Br Med J; 1978 Apr; 1(6117):882-3. PubMed ID: 638506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [New intensifying films in roentgen diagnosis. A clinically oriented evaluation of rare earth films in comparison to conventional films].
Beyer HK; Schulze B
Rontgenpraxis; 1981 Sep; 34(9):387-94. PubMed ID: 7302710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of automatic exposure controls when used with rare-earth intensifying screens.
Olson A; High M
Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 7255727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Importance of rare earth screens for optimizing radiographic imaging quality].
Keller U
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Jan; 41(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3460773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of rare-earth intensifying screens in x-ray studies of children].
Gurvich AM; Soshchin NP; Tsyplenkov VG; Berliant NIa; Golovkova SI
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1979; (1):69-74. PubMed ID: 425307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The LSF and MTF of rare-earth oxysulfide intensifying screens.
Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjärngard BE
Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):473-7. PubMed ID: 981630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of rare-earth intensifying screens in obstetric radiography.
Pritchard C; Hufton A
Radiography; 1976 Jan; 42(493):14-7. PubMed ID: 1265231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Luminophores on a base of rare-earth element compounds for X-ray intensifying screens].
Boev EI; Rabkin IKh; Glagoleva AA; Glagoleva MA; Korsaev VV
Med Tekh; 1988; (3):31-6. PubMed ID: 3047518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitfalls of rare earth imaging: conquering the three Ps.
Lam RW; Price SC
Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 1557500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Current control of image quality in a radiology laboratory].
Wójtowicz J
Pol Przegl Radiol; 1983; 47(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 6377274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
