BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12652687)

  • 1. [Critical appraisal of evidence on diagnostic tests].
    Furukawa T
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jan; 51(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12652687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
    Jaeschke R; Guyatt GH; Sackett DL
    JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 8309035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Critical appraisal of the literature in systematic review].
    Miyake K
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jul; 51(7):691-5. PubMed ID: 12924256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpreting diagnostic tests with continuous results and no gold standard: a common scenario explained using the tuberculin skin test.
    Dobler CC; Murad MH
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Dec; 22(6):199-201. PubMed ID: 29056603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature.
    Dodd JD; MacEneaney PM; Malone DE
    Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):915-22. PubMed ID: 14610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine in pathology: an introduction.
    Marchevsky AM
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2005 May; 22(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 16639989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
    O'Connor A; Evans RB
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistics in the pathology laboratory: diagnostic test interpretation.
    Empson MB
    Pathology; 2002 Aug; 34(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 12190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Shapiro DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compliance with methodological standards when evaluating ophthalmic diagnostic tests.
    Harper R; Reeves B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Jul; 40(8):1650-7. PubMed ID: 10393031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee: a meta-analysis.
    Scholten RJ; Devillé WL; Opstelten W; Bijl D; van der Plas CG; Bouter LM
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):938-44. PubMed ID: 11711009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appraising and applying evidence about a diagnostic test during a performance-based assessment.
    Bergus G; Vogelgesang S; Tansey J; Franklin E; Feld R
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15482600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, part 6. An introduction to critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines.
    Sanderlin BW; AbdulRahim N
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2007 Aug; 107(8):321-4. PubMed ID: 17785690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Critical appraisal of diagnostic studies in nuclear medicine].
    Marienhagen J; Eilles Ch
    Nuklearmedizin; 2003 Aug; 42(4):129-34. PubMed ID: 12937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
    Reid MC; Lachs MS; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):645-51. PubMed ID: 7637146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards evidence-based diagnosis in developing countries: the use of likelihood ratios for robust quick diagnosis.
    Soltani A; Moayyeri A
    Ann Saudi Med; 2006; 26(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 16861864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [How to practically solve diagnostic or therapeutic problems in an EMB process?].
    Delvenne C; Pasleau F
    Rev Med Liege; 2000 Apr; 55(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 10909305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for the assessment of new diagnostic tests.
    van der Schouw YT; Verbeek AL; Ruijs SH
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Jun; 30(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 7490184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.