BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12652901)

  • 1. ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition.
    Caharel S; Poiroux S; Bernard C; Thibaut F; Lalonde R; Rebai M
    Int J Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 112(12):1499-512. PubMed ID: 12652901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociation between recognition of familiar scenes and of faces in patients with very mild Alzheimer disease: an event-related potential study.
    Cheng PJ; Pai MC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1519-1525. PubMed ID: 20400370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of familiarity and emotional expression on face processing examined by ERPs in patients with schizophrenia.
    Caharel S; Bernard C; Thibaut F; Haouzir S; Di Maggio-Clozel C; Allio G; Fouldrin G; Petit M; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Sep; 95(1-3):186-96. PubMed ID: 17644314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons.
    Jemel B; Pisani M; Calabria M; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 17(2):431-46. PubMed ID: 12880913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
    Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potentials of self-face recognition in children with pervasive developmental disorders.
    Gunji A; Inagaki M; Inoue Y; Takeshima Y; Kaga M
    Brain Dev; 2009 Feb; 31(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18590948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition.
    Gosling A; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2736-45. PubMed ID: 21679721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep and shallow encoding effects on face recognition: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Dec; 78(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 20797414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces.
    Jemel B; Pisani M; Rousselle L; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2024-40. PubMed ID: 16243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Feb; 14(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 14704210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity.
    Tanaka JW; Curran T; Porterfield AL; Collins D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1488-97. PubMed ID: 16989550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The P200 predominantly reflects distance-to-norm in face space whereas the N250 reflects activation of identity-specific representations of known faces.
    Wuttke SJ; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():86-95. PubMed ID: 30529289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neural speed of familiar face recognition.
    Barragan-Jason G; Cauchoix M; Barbeau EJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():390-401. PubMed ID: 26100560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Feb; 15(2):353-72. PubMed ID: 11798271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP study of viewpoint-independence in familiar-face recognition.
    Miyakoshi M; Kanayama N; Nomura M; Iidaka T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 18474403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.