These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12653001)

  • 1. The role of hearing aids in providing environmental feedback for the profoundly hearing impaired.
    Bhat G; Kakrani VA; Pratinnidhi AK
    Indian J Public Health; 2002; 46(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 12653001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing impairment - technological advances and insights.
    O'Leary S; Chang A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2008 May; 37(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 18464960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55-74-year-old first-time hearing aid users.
    Davis A
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S39-52. PubMed ID: 12918628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Societal cost of pre-lingual deafness].
    Bubbico L; Bartolucci MA; Broglio D; Boner A
    Ann Ig; 2007; 19(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 17547219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Developments in the area of hearing aids].
    van Drongelen AW; Peters-Volleberg GW; van den Berg Jeths A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2417-21. PubMed ID: 11776666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Treatment of hearing impairment in children].
    Hempel JM; Krause E
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 May; 148(19):30-3. PubMed ID: 16736702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-assessment of classroom assistive listening devices.
    Odelius J; Johansson O
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jul; 49(7):508-17. PubMed ID: 20524774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of single-sided deafness with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Yuen HW; Bodmer D; Smilsky K; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19559952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Devices for the hearing impaired.
    Zazove P; Kileny PR
    Am Fam Physician; 1992 Sep; 46(3):851-8. PubMed ID: 1492872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Branemark-type osteo-integrated implants for the adaptation of endosseous hearing aids].
    Candela Cano FA; Aguado Blass F; Sada García-Lomas J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1990; 41(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 2337486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The needs of hearing impaired children's parents who attend to auditory verbal therapy-counseling program.
    Yucel E; Derim D; Celik D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1097-111. PubMed ID: 18468697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilateral amplification for the elderly: are two aids better than one?
    Holmes AE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S63-7. PubMed ID: 12918631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.