These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12653626)

  • 1. How to (or not to) communicate science.
    Rose SP
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2003 Apr; 31(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12653626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science.
    Caulfield T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):337-9. PubMed ID: 15245905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinning the Genome: Why Science Hype Matters.
    Caulfield T
    Perspect Biol Med; 2018; 61(4):560-571. PubMed ID: 30613038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [To tell science. Risks, opportunities and new tools of communication.].
    Milano G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Jan; 110(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 30720012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science and the sources of hype.
    Caulfield T; Condit C
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(3-4):209-17. PubMed ID: 22488464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can hype be a force for good?: Inviting unexpected engagement with science and technology futures.
    Roberson TM
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32438851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Science communication in transition: genomics hype, public engagement, education and commercialization pressures.
    Bubela T
    Clin Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 17026631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constructing publics in museums' science communication.
    Hetland P
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Nov; 28(8):958-972. PubMed ID: 31434550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bridging the divide between science and journalism.
    Van Eperen L; Marincola FM; Strohm J
    J Transl Med; 2010 Mar; 8():25. PubMed ID: 20219123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurodharma Self-Help: Personalized Science Communication as Brain Management.
    Eklöf J
    J Med Humanit; 2017 Sep; 38(3):303-317. PubMed ID: 26242606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factual accuracy and the cultural context of science in popular media: Perspectives of media makers, middle school students, and university students on an entertainment television program.
    Szu E; Osborne J; Patterson AD
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Jul; 26(5):596-611. PubMed ID: 27340172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why public dissemination of science matters: a manifesto.
    Eagleman DM
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(30):12147-9. PubMed ID: 23884922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific communication in a post-truth society.
    Iyengar S; Massey DS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(16):7656-7661. PubMed ID: 30478050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
    Post S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hype and public trust in science.
    Master Z; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Jun; 19(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 22045550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy.
    Tal A; Wansink B
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 25319823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.