121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12653802)
1. Comparison of standard and modified SPT method.
Zawodniak A; Kupczyk M; Górski P; Kuna P
Allergy; 2003 Mar; 58(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 12653802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Precision and economy of skin prick tests].
Kupczyk M; Kupryś I; Kuna P
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2002 Mar; 12(69):190-3. PubMed ID: 12053585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.
Andersen HH; Lundgaard AC; Petersen AS; Hauberg LE; Sharma N; Hansen SD; Elberling J; Arendt-Nielsen L
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156211. PubMed ID: 27213613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The results of skin prick testing in patients with allergic rhinitis: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet.
Ateş A; Kinikli G; Turgay M; Aydoğan N; Duman M
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2004; 22(2-3):109-14. PubMed ID: 15565947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE
Masukane S; Matsui T; Tokumo N; Makino A; Kitamura K; Takasato Y; Sugiura S; Ito K
Arerugi; 2022; 71(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 35831164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between specific IgE levels and skin prick test results of local and imported American cockroach, dog, cat, dust mites and mold allergen extracts.
Visitsunthorn N; Sripramong C; Bunnag C; Jirapongsananuruk O
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2017 Mar; 35(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 27362401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. II. Reproducibility and relationship between skin sensitivity estimated by end-point titration and histamine equivalent reaction using skin prick test and intradermal test.
Malling HJ
Allergy; 1985 Jul; 40(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 4041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of montelukast (10mg daily) and loratadine (10mg daily) on wheal, flare and itching reactions in skin prick tests.
Kupczyk M; Kupryś I; Górski P; Kuna P
Pulm Pharmacol Ther; 2007; 20(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16516511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity and specificity of different skin prick tests with latex extracts in pediatric patients with suspected natural rubber latex allergy--a cohort study.
Bernardini R; Pucci N; Azzari C; Novembre E; De Martino M; Milani M
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2008 Jun; 19(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 18266828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ranitidine (150 mg daily) inhibits wheal, flare, and itching reactions in skin-prick tests.
Kupczyk M; Kupryś I; Bocheńska-Marciniak M; Górski P; Kuna P
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 18201437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods.
Lee SC; Sim DW; Lee J; Jeong KY; Park KH; Lee JH; Kim JD; Park JW
J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Mar; 33(13):e101. PubMed ID: 29573248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The use of laser Doppler flowmetry for assessment of skin prick tests with histamine solutions and allergens].
Zakrzewski A; Kruszewski J; Kłos K; Lademann A
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Mar; 18(105):282-6. PubMed ID: 15997633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergen skin test reaction patterns in children (Jackola DR; Pierson-Mullany L; Blumenthal MN; Rosenberg A
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2003 Dec; 132(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 14707468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative skin prick testing. Dose-response of histamine- and allergen-induced wheal reactions.
Malling HJ
Allergy; 1987 Apr; 42(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 3592144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results.
van der Valk JP; Gerth van Wijk R; Hoorn E; Groenendijk L; Groenendijk IM; de Jong NW
Clin Transl Allergy; 2015; 6():8. PubMed ID: 26909142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different local and imported histamine concentrations used as a skin prick test positive control.
Visitsunthorn N; Visitsunthorn K; Aulla S; Bunnag C; Jirapongsananuruk O
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2016 Dec; 34(4):295-299. PubMed ID: 27362402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.
Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Søborg M; Biering I
Allergy; 1983 Jul; 38(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 6614408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
