These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12654981)

  • 1. Atypical speech is rare in individuals with normal developmental histories.
    Miller JW; Dodrill CB; Born DE; Ojemann GA
    Neurology; 2003 Mar; 60(6):1042-4. PubMed ID: 12654981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The utility of the intracarotid Amytal procedure in determining hemispheric speech lateralization in pediatric epilepsy patients undergoing surgery.
    Hinz AC; Berger MS; Ojemann GA; Dodrill C
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 May; 10(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 7923234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of patterns of cerebral language dominance. An amobarbital study.
    Kurthen M; Helmstaedter C; Linke DB; Hufnagel A; Elger CE; Schramm J
    Brain Lang; 1994 May; 46(4):536-64. PubMed ID: 8044676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unilateral intracarotid amobarbital procedure for language lateralization.
    Wellmer J; Fernández G; Linke DB; Urbach H; Elger CE; Kurthen M
    Epilepsia; 2005 Nov; 46(11):1764-72. PubMed ID: 16302856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between fMRI and the Wada Test.
    Benke T; Köylü B; Visani P; Karner E; Brenneis C; Bartha L; Trinka E; Trieb T; Felber S; Bauer G; Chemelli A; Willmes K
    Epilepsia; 2006 Aug; 47(8):1308-19. PubMed ID: 16922875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cerebral language lateralization: evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing.
    Loring DW; Meador KJ; Lee GP; Murro AM; Smith JR; Flanigin HF; Gallagher BB; King DW
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(8):831-8. PubMed ID: 2247209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A reconsideration of bilateral language representation based on the intracarotid amobarbital procedure.
    Risse GL; Gates JR; Fangman MC
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Feb; 33(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 9056279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric lateralization of motor and speech functions after early brain lesion: study of 73 epileptic patients with intracarotid amytal test.
    Rey M; Dellatolas G; Bancaud J; Talairach J
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 3129671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective criteria for reporting language dominance by intracarotid amobarbital procedure.
    Benbadis SR; Dinner DS; Chelune GJ; Piedmonte M; Lüders HO
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Oct; 17(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 8557809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The intra-carotid amobarbital test--indications--procedure--results].
    Kurthen M
    Nervenarzt; 1992 Dec; 63(12):713-24. PubMed ID: 1494385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The determination of cerebral speech dominance with the intracarotid amobarbital test].
    Kurthen M
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 1993 Mar; 61(3):77-89. PubMed ID: 8477921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. INTRACAROTID SODIUM AMYTAL FOR THE LATERALIZATION OF CEREBRAL SPEECH DOMINANCE; OBSERVATIONS IN 123 PATIENTS.
    BRANCH C; MILNER B; RASMUSSEN T
    J Neurosurg; 1964 May; 21():399-405. PubMed ID: 14168208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linguistic perseveration in dominant-side intracarotid amobarbital tests.
    Kurthen M; Linke DB; Elger CE; Schramm J
    Cortex; 1992 Jun; 28(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 1499307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The intracarotid amobarbital procedure: an historical perspective.
    Snyder PJ; Harris LJ
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Feb; 33(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 9056274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is speech arrest during wada testing a valid method for determining hemispheric representation of language?
    Benbadis SR; Binder JR; Swanson SJ; Fischer M; Hammeke TA; Morris GL; Frost JA; Springer JA
    Brain Lang; 1998 Dec; 65(3):441-6. PubMed ID: 9843613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Localization of language cortices by functional MR imaging compared with intracarotid amobarbital hemispheric sedation.
    Bahn MM; Lin W; Silbergeld DL; Miller JW; Kuppusamy K; Cook RJ; Hammer G; Wetzel R; Cross D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):575-9. PubMed ID: 9242780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeated intracarotid amobarbital tests.
    Haber AH; Vassallo JL; Tatum WO; Benbadis SR
    Epilepsia; 2007 Sep; 48(9):1815-1816. PubMed ID: 17824949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. INTRACAROTID SODIUM AMYLOBARBITONE AND CEREBRAL DOMINANCE FOR SPEECH AND CONSCIOUSNESS.
    SERAFETINIDES EA; HOARE RD; DRIVER M
    Brain; 1965 Mar; 88():107-30. PubMed ID: 14282892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ambiguous language in Wada evaluations.
    Meador KJ
    Epilepsia; 2004; 45 Suppl 4():24-5. PubMed ID: 15281953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The intracarotid amobarbital procedure: when is it worth repeating?
    Whitman LA; Morrison CE; Becske T; Barr WB; Carlson C
    Epilepsia; 2012 Apr; 53(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 22309160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.