188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12656074)
1. The forum. What theological understandings contribute to protecting mentally impaired persons in medical treatment and research.
McKenzie DM
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-80, 287-90. PubMed ID: 12656074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The forum. Autonomy, beneficence, and justice in the wider context.
Walker MU
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-80, 291-3. PubMed ID: 12656076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The forum. Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research.
Fisher CB
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 12656072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent.
Fisher CB
Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):159-71. PubMed ID: 15868667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The forum. Competence to consent to research: where psychology, ethics, and the law intersect.
Rosenfeld B
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 12656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consent and persons with marginal mental impairment.
Veatch RM
Ethics Intellect Disabil; 2004; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 15835084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protestant perspectives on informed consent (particularly in research involving human participants).
Childress JF
Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):187-205. PubMed ID: 15868669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The psychology of competence and informed consent: understanding decision-making with regard to clinical practice.
Rosenfeld B
Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 15868668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
US National Bioethics Advisory Commission
J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The subject advocate: protecting the interests of participants with fluctuating decisionmaking capacity.
Stroup S; Appelbaum P
IRB; 2003; 25(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 14569988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How can valid informed consent be obtained from a psychotic patient for research into psychosis? Three perspectives.
Freckelton I; Keks N; Howe V; Foister K; Jenkins K; Copolov D; Sullivan D
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):60-75. PubMed ID: 15069966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics?: conceptual clarifications.
Rehbock T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Oct; 20(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21843383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic psychiatric studies and research ethical considerations.
Allebeck P
Nord Psykiatr Tidsskr; 1997; 51(Suppl. 39):53-6. PubMed ID: 11657031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent of the mentally disabled: a failing fiction.
Chayet NL
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):82-85+. PubMed ID: 11662298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.
Cook-Deegan RM
Cerebrum; 2000; 2(2):73-91. PubMed ID: 15986545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elderly participants in biomedical and behavioral research: ethical and legal issues: literature abstracts.
Kapp MB
J Ethics Law Aging; 1998; 4(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 11657722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
