These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12656085)

  • 1. Human reproduction: reflections on the Nachmani case.
    Dorner D
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12656085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Israeli court gives wife right to embryos.
    Greenberg J
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No ABA embryo policy.
    Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11647577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: an inalienable rights approach to frozen embryo disputes.
    Coleman CH
    Minn Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 84(1):55-127. PubMed ID: 16514764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Israeli court rules on right to motherhood.
    Fishman RH
    Lancet; 1996 Oct; 348(9033):1024. PubMed ID: 11660251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices.
    Ahnen CD
    Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
    Sieck WA
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judge orders divorcing couple's frozen embryos destroyed.
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Sep; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11647640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kass v. Kass.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
    Wests N Y Suppl; 1997 Sep; 663():581-602. PubMed ID: 12041117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Halakhic approaches to the resolution of disputes concerning the disposition of preembryos.
    Breitowitz YA
    Tradition; 1996; 31(1):64-91. PubMed ID: 11654662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
    Kaplan S
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
    Katz DA
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives.
    Cahn NR
    Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court says woman can bar embryos' use.
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():B6. PubMed ID: 12155241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis.
    Prygoski PJ
    Tenn Law Rev; 1994; 61(2):609-46. PubMed ID: 11652933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No use of stored embryos without consent.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Sep; (191):5-6. PubMed ID: 16208789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Israeli fertilised-egg case to be heard again.
    Fishman RH
    Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8963):1498. PubMed ID: 11644694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Massachusetts case is latest to ask court to decide fate of frozen embryos.
    Goldberg C
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.