These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12656385)

  • 21. On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility.
    Bradley JS; Reich RD; Norcross SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1820-8. PubMed ID: 10530010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms.
    Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):846-54. PubMed ID: 3760338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experimental comparison between speech transmission index, rapid speech transmission index, and speech intelligibility index.
    Larm P; Hongisto V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1106-17. PubMed ID: 16521772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of an Application to Verify Classroom Acoustic Recommendations for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing in a General Education Setting.
    Spratford M; Walker EA; McCreery RW
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 28(4):927-934. PubMed ID: 31682768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time-forward speech intelligibility in time-reversed rooms.
    Longworth-Reed L; Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):EL13-9. PubMed ID: 19173377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of category goodness of /t/ and /k/ in typical and misarticulated children's speech.
    Strömbergsson S; Salvi G; House D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3422-35. PubMed ID: 26093431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subjective Experience of Speech Depending on the Acoustic Treatment in an Ordinary Room.
    Arvidsson E; Nilsson E; Bard-Hagberg D; Karlsson OJI
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pre-Sabine room acoustic design guidelines based on human voice directivity.
    Postma BNJ; Jouan S; Katz BFG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2428. PubMed ID: 29716287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations.
    Goldsworthy RL; Greenberg JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3679-89. PubMed ID: 15658718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms.
    Astolfi A; Pellerey F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):163-73. PubMed ID: 18177148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simulating environmental and psychological acoustic factors of the operating room.
    Bennett CL; Dudaryk R; Ayers AL; McNeer RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3855-63. PubMed ID: 26723340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic evaluation and adjustment of an open-plan office through architectural design and noise control.
    Passero CR; Zannin PH
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Nov; 43(6):1066-71. PubMed ID: 22507599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Towards measuring the Speech Transmission Index in fluctuating noise: Accuracy and limitations.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):818. PubMed ID: 28253636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ten Ways to Provide a High-Quality Acoustical Environment in Schools.
    Siebein GW; Gold MA; Siebein GW; Ermann MG
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2000 Oct; 31(4):376-384. PubMed ID: 27764477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics.
    Bistafa SR; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):861-75. PubMed ID: 10687696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.