These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

745 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12658204)

  • 21. Review of recent US cost estimates of revascularization.
    Nagle PC; Smith AW
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Oct; 10(11 Suppl):S370-6. PubMed ID: 15603246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.
    Mercado N; Wijns W; Serruys PW; Sigwart U; Flather MD; Stables RH; O'Neill WW; Rodriguez A; Lemos PA; Hueb WA; Gersh BJ; Booth J; Boersma E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):512-9. PubMed ID: 16077421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Halkos ME; Puskas JD
    Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 89(4):913-22, ix. PubMed ID: 19782844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Off-pump, minimally invasive and robotic coronary revascularization yield improved outcomes over traditional on-pump CABG.
    Atluri P; Kozin ED; Hiesinger W; Woo YJ
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19117020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive subclavian/axillary artery to coronary artery bypass (SAXCAB): review and classification.
    Coulson AS; Glasgow EF; Bonatti J
    Heart Surg Forum; 2001; 4(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 11502492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
    Sim EK; Goh JJ; Cheng A; Tan HC; Lim YT
    Singapore Med J; 1999 Feb; 40(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 10414161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Redo minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Jacobs S; Holzhey D; Walther T; Falk V; Mohr FW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Oct; 80(4):1336-9. PubMed ID: 16181865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overview of systematic reviews on invasive treatment of stable coronary artery disease.
    Kuukasjärvi P; Malmivaara A; Halinen M; Hartikainen J; Keto PE; Talvensaari T; Tierala I; Mäkelä M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 16571198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeat surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of the left thoracotomy approach.
    Harris DG; Coetzee AR; Augustyn JT; Saaiman A
    Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun; 12(3):E163-7. PubMed ID: 19546070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus percutaneous coronary stenting for stenosis of the left anterior descending artery.
    Takagi H; Tanabashi T; Kawai N; Umemoto T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Aug; 32(2):400; author reply 400-1. PubMed ID: 17513117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AANA journal course: update for nurse anesthetists--anesthetic considerations for minimally invasive direct vision coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Creager N; Kraska S; Struebing VL
    AANA J; 1999 Aug; 67(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10497458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Agostoni P; Parisi Q; Turri M; Anselmi M; Vassanelli C; Zardini P; Biasucci LM
    Ital Heart J; 2003 Apr; 4(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 12784781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Midterm follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention techniques.
    Fraund S; Herrmann G; Witzke A; Hedderich J; Lutter G; Brandt M; Böning A; Cremer J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1225-31. PubMed ID: 15797053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials.
    Taira DA; Seto TB; Siegrist R; Cosgrove R; Berezin R; Cohen DJ
    Am Heart J; 2003 Mar; 145(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 12660668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients.
    Stroupe KT; Morrison DA; Hlatky MA; Barnett PG; Cao L; Lyttle C; Hynes DM; Henderson WG;
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1251-7. PubMed ID: 16966588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [How much can off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting be performed for complete revascularization using only in situ arterial conduits?].
    Niinami H; Takeuchi Y; Suda Y; Tabata M; Yamamoto M; Asano R; Ikeda M
    Kyobu Geka; 2003 Jul; 56(8 Suppl):661-6. PubMed ID: 12910947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hannan RL; King RC; Tribble CG; Spotnitz WD; Kron IL
    Va Med Q; 1998; 125(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 9448477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: technical considerations.
    Reddy RC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011; 23(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 22172359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Calafiore AM; Angelini GD; Bergsland J; Salerno TA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1545-8. PubMed ID: 8893612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus stenting.
    Takagi H; Kato T; Matsuno Y; Umemoto T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):632; author reply 633. PubMed ID: 16473513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.