488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12658257)
1. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication.
Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
Otwombe KN; Ogutu B
East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. P-value in hypothesis testing and estimation: the need to standardize its reporting in the Central African Journal of Medicine.
Siziya S
Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Feb; 42(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 8653768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
Evans RG; Su DF
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Providing the best for our patients: evidence-based practice.
Pearson L
Nurse Pract; 2001 Mar; 26(3):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 11270152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ["Be creative and write about it!" A reader's letter on: "Confidence intervals and their relevance for the interpretation of results" by Hans-Peter Beck-Bornholdt, Hans-Hermann Dubben, Strahlenther Onkol 2000:176:205-10 (No.5)].
Baier K; Hädinger U
Strahlenther Onkol; 2000 Oct; 176(10):481. PubMed ID: 11068595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
Heddle NM; Ness P
Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.
Moher D
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 56(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19247756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Writing the methods.
Coverdale J; Roberts L; Louie A; Beresin E
Acad Psychiatry; 2006; 30(5):361-4. PubMed ID: 17021142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. We need to use first person pronouns in our writing.
Winslow EH; Guzzetta CE
Nurs Outlook; 2000; 48(4):156-7. PubMed ID: 10953073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication bias.
Lubowitz JH; Poehling GG
Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1031-2. PubMed ID: 17027398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding statistical significance.
Hayat MJ
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20445438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
Vintzileos AM; Beazoglou T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1070-6. PubMed ID: 15507923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PRISMA.
Blegen MA
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(4):233. PubMed ID: 20585220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.
Sutton AJ; Abrams KR; Jones DR; Sheldon TA; Song F
Health Technol Assess; 1998; 2(19):1-276. PubMed ID: 10347832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
Squires BP; Elmslie TJ
CMAJ; 1990 Jul; 143(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 2357677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Publishing workshops: Number 2. Preparing a manuscript reporting quantitative research findings.
Crisp J; Chick N; Rodgers J; Smith T
Nurs Prax N Z; 1996 Jul; 11(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8970329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reflections on the design and reporting of STD/HIV behavioral intervention research.
O'Leary A; DiClemente RJ; Aral SO
AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Feb; 9(1 Suppl):1-14. PubMed ID: 9083595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
