287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12658424)
1. Robotic surgery and resident training.
De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
Dakin GF; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic suturing evaluation among surgical residents.
Nguyen NT; Mayer KL; Bold RJ; Larson M; Foster S; Ho HS; Wolfe BM
J Surg Res; 2000 Sep; 93(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 10945954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing a training program for residents in robotic surgery.
Moles JJ; Connelly PE; Sarti EE; Baredes S
Laryngoscope; 2009 Oct; 119(10):1927-31. PubMed ID: 19655337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized evaluation of surgical resident proficiency with laparoscopic suturing after course instruction.
Harold KL; Matthews BD; Backus CL; Pratt BL; Heniford BT
Surg Endosc; 2002 Dec; 16(12):1729-31. PubMed ID: 12140636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
Rassweiler J; Frede T
Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents.
Marecik SJ; Chaudhry V; Jan A; Pearl RK; Park JJ; Prasad LM
Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):349-55; discussion 355. PubMed ID: 17320533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
Advincula AP
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic surgery?
Panait L; Shetty S; Shewokis PA; Sanchez JA
J Surg Res; 2014 Mar; 187(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 24189181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rashid HH; Leung YY; Rashid MJ; Oleyourryk G; Valvo JR; Eichel L
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16844450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study.
Guru KA; Kuvshinoff BW; Pavlov-Shapiro S; Bienko MB; Aftab MN; Brady WE; Mohler JL
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17189118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks.
Nio D; Bemelman WA; Boer KT; Dunker MS; Gouma DJ; Gulik TM
Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 11928018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: implications for training.
Obek C; Hubka M; Porter M; Chang L; Porter JR
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16283847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of environmental noise on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance.
Siu KC; Suh IH; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
Surgery; 2010 Jan; 147(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 19879611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand-held robotic instrument for dextrous laparoscopic interventions.
Piccigallo M; Focacci F; Tonet O; Megali G; Quaglia C; Dario P
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Dec; 4(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18803339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
