These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12661112)
1. [Perinatal health indicators in 2001 and its evolution since 1994. Results from the Audipog sentinel network]. Mamelle N; David S; Vendittelli F; Pinquier D; Claris O; Maria B; Marès P Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 1():6-39. PubMed ID: 12661112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prenatal health in 2002-2003. Survey of medical practice. Results from the Audipog sentinel network]. Mamelle N; Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Crenn-Hébert C; Lémery D; Marès P; Rozan MA; Maria B; Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Aug; 32 Spec No 1():4-22. PubMed ID: 15597666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The Association for Computerized Medical Records Users in Perinatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology sentinel network for maternity hospitals. II. Changes in practices and results. 1994-1997]. Mamelle N; Munoz F; Lehingue Y; Pasquier JC; Béranger C J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Jun; 27(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9690155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do perinatal guidelines have an impact on obstetric practices? Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Crenn-Hébert C; Giraud-Roufast A; Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Oct; 60(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22981161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The Association of Computerized Medical Records Users in Perinatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Sentinel Network for maternity hospitals. I. Perinatal health indicators in 1994]. Mamelle N; Lehingue Y; Munoz F; Miginiac M; Béranger C; Tounissoux D J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 8964953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Who delivers where? Who is born where? Analysis of the 1997-1998 AUDIPOG Sentinel Network]. David S; Mamelle N; Rivière O J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):772-783. PubMed ID: 11139714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Development of the main indicators of perinatal health in metropolitan France between 1995 and 1998. Results of the national perinatal survey]. Blondel B; Norton J; du Mazaubrun C; Bréart G J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Oct; 30(6):552-64. PubMed ID: 11883022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The perinatal situation in France. Trends between 1981 and 1995]. Blondel B; Bréart G; du Mazaubrun C; Badeyan G; Wcislo M; Lordier A; Matet N J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(8):770-80. PubMed ID: 9509317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Indicators and evaluation tools for perinatal care networks]. Mamelle N; David S; Lombrail P; Rozé JC; J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(7 Pt 1):641-55; discussion 655-6. PubMed ID: 11917360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric and neonatal risk of pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology: a matched control study. Kozinszky Z; Zádori J; Orvos H; Katona M; Pál A; Kovács L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Sep; 82(9):850-6. PubMed ID: 12911448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Breech presentation at term: evolution of French practices and an analysis of neonatal results in regards to obstetrical management of breech presentation, from AUDIPOG Database]. Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Pons JC; Mamelle N; J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 May; 31(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 12016405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Action for improving perinatal health: insight from the AUDIPOG sentinel network]. Mamelle N; Maria B; Rozan MA; Claris O; Crenn Hébert C; Pinquier D; Marès P J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Nov; 32(7):617-22. PubMed ID: 14699329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of an expected caesarean section rate taking into account the case mix of a maternity hospital. Analysis from the AUDIPOG Sentinelle Network (France). Obstetricians of AUDIPOG. Association of Users of Computerised Files in Perinatalogy, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. David S; Mamelle N; Rivière O BJOG; 2001 Sep; 108(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 11563460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference? Coulm B; Le Ray C; Lelong N; Drewniak N; Zeitlin J; Blondel B Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 23281900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin]. Bilar M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: a seven year experience of a tertiary care center. Yücesoy G; Ozkan S; Bodur H; Tan T; Calişkan E; Vural B; Corakçi A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Nov; 273(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 15834580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two year audit of perinatal mortality at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital. Shrestha M; Manandhar DS; Dhakal S; Nepal N Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2006; 4(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 18603894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]