298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12661399)
1. Frequent questions on marking the surgical site.
Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Patient Safety
OR Manager; 2003 Feb; 19(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 12661399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensuring correct surgery in the Veterans Health Administration.
Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Patient Safety
OR Manager; 2003 Feb; 19(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 12701605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Handoffs: lessons from other industries.
Patterson E
OR Manager; 2005 Aug; 21(8):11-2. PubMed ID: 16146178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items.
OR Manager; 2005 Apr; 21(4):1, 18-20. PubMed ID: 15909366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Marking the site for spinal surgery.
OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 14740472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Seeking better ways to improve patient safety.
Bonifazi WL
OR Manager; 2000 May; 16(5):1, 13-4. PubMed ID: 11067164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. System marks new method of preventing wrong-site surgery.
Page L
Mater Manag Health Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 16583616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who should mark the surgical site?
OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 14740470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient participation in surgical pause.
Jeffrey A; Curry P
Anaesthesia; 2010 Feb; 65(2):217. PubMed ID: 20402862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative communication to improve safety: a literature review.
Penprase B; Elstun L; Ferguson C; Schaper M; Tiller C
Nurs Manage; 2010 Nov; 41(11):18-24; quiz 24-5. PubMed ID: 20966789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditing and improving the sponge count process.
Farrell V; Higbie V; Cleveland S
OR Manager; 2003 Mar; 19(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12661500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Doing right to prevent wrong-site surgery.
Ridge RA
Nursing; 2008 Mar; 38(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 18418167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient participation in surgical site marking: can this be an additional tool to help avoid wrong-site surgery?
Bergal LM; Schwarzkopf R; Walsh M; Tejwani NC
J Patient Saf; 2010 Dec; 6(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 21500609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fine-tuning surgical site verification.
OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 14740471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety program to prevent 'wrong side' errors.
OR Manager; 1996 Dec; 12(12):19-20. PubMed ID: 10162726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing systems the hands-on way. The VA National Center for Patient Safety's Museum.
Williams L
Md Med; 2005; 6(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 16454434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. JCAHO answers questions on new surgical site-marking stand.
OR Manager; 2003 Jul; 19(7):1, 7-10. PubMed ID: 12870355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative site marking for eye surgery may be transferred from patient to patient or moved, increasing the potential for wrong site surgery.
Lambley RG; Herbert EN
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):295. PubMed ID: 18227214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient Safety Alert. Retained instruments: rare error or safety concern?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Apr; 28(4):suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 12683097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative site marking.
Mokashi A; Stead RE; Subramaniam S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Feb; 93(2):275-6. PubMed ID: 19174408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
