These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12661861)

  • 1. Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies.
    Osterhout L; Allen MD; McLaughlin J; Inoue K
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Dec; 30(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 12661861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
    Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N400 and P600 or the role of the ERP correlates in sentence comprehension: some applications to the Italian language.
    Balconi M; Pozzoli U
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):268-302. PubMed ID: 15248594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: a study with event-related potentials.
    Kolk HH; Chwilla DJ; van Herten M; Oor PJ
    Brain Lang; 2003 Apr; 85(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12681346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.
    Osterhout L
    Brain Lang; 1997 Oct; 59(3):494-522. PubMed ID: 9299074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Li P; Piao Q; Liu Y; Huang Y; Shu H
    Brain Lang; 2013 Jul; 126(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 23648559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related brain potentials elicited by semantic and syntactic anomalies during auditory sentence processing.
    Faustmann A; Murdoch BE; Finnigan SP; Copland DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):708-25. PubMed ID: 16515142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli.
    Balconi M; Pozzoli U
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):71-98. PubMed ID: 15968921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How is sentence processing affected by external semantic and syntactic information? Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Schacht A; Martín-Loeches M; Casado P; Abdel Rahman R; Sel A; Sommer W
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9742. PubMed ID: 20305820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-linguistic variation in the neurophysiological response to semantic processing: evidence from anomalies at the borderline of awareness.
    Tune S; Schlesewsky M; Small SL; Sanford AJ; Bohan J; Sassenhagen J; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():147-66. PubMed ID: 24447768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.
    Fedorenko E; Blank IA; Siegelman M; Mineroff Z
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104348. PubMed ID: 32569894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study.
    Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Vespignani F; De Vincenzi M; Job R; Ciccarelli L; Palomba D; Stegagno L
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 322(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11958830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations.
    De Vincenzi M; Job R; Di Matteo R; Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Ciccarelli L; Vespignani F
    Brain Lang; 2003 May; 85(2):280-96. PubMed ID: 12735945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
    Martín-Loeches M; Nigbur R; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1093(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16678138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation.
    Fitz H; Chang F
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Jun; 111():15-52. PubMed ID: 30921626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations.
    Friederici AD; Pfeifer E; Hahne A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1993 Oct; 1(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 8257874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.