These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12664121)
21. Significant perturbation in renal functional magnetic resonance imaging parameters and contrast retention for iodixanol compared with iopromide: an experimental study using blood-oxygen-level-dependent/diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in rats. Wang YC; Tang A; Chang D; Zhang SJ; Ju S Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):699-706. PubMed ID: 24879299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity of iodixanol and iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography. Shin DH; Choi DJ; Youn TJ; Yoon CH; Suh JW; Kim KI; Cho YS; Cho GY; Chae IH; Kim CH Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 21545991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of non-ionic monomeric and dimeric iodinated contrast media on renal and systemic haemodynamics in rats. Idée JM; Lancelot E; Berthommier C; Couturier-Goulas V; Vazin V; Corot C Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2000; 14(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 10681069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical experience with iohexol versus iopromide in excretory urography. Bischoff W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():108-10. PubMed ID: 2568776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of excretory urographic contrast effects of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic iodinated contrast media in dogs. Kishimoto M; Yamada K; Watanabe A; Miyamoto K; Iwasaki T; Miyake Y J Vet Med Sci; 2007 Jul; 69(7):713-5. PubMed ID: 17675802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Renal effects of bicarbonate versus saline infusion for iso- and lowosmolar contrast media in rats. Ladwig M; Flemming B; Seeliger E; Sargsyan L; Persson PB Invest Radiol; 2011 Nov; 46(11):672-7. PubMed ID: 21623210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental urography with new non-ionic dimeric and monomeric contrast agents. Holtz E; Golman K Acta Radiol Suppl; 1987; 370():49-55. PubMed ID: 2980312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media. Nauert C; Mützel W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography. Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: II. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iopromide in comparison with ioxaglate. Taenzer V; Meiisel P; Hartwig P Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():153-5. PubMed ID: 6139071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Renal tolerability of iopromide and iodixanol in 562 renally impaired patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation: the DIRECT study. Chen Y; Hu S; Liu Y; Zhao R; Wang L; Fu G; He Q; Su X; Zheng Y; Qi X; Liu H; Wang J; Gao W; Wang M; Liu S; Zheng X; He B; Yang P; Zhou S; Gao C; Qiu C EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):830-8. PubMed ID: 23045301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Iodixanol versus iopromide in cancer patients: Evidence from a randomized clinical trial. Terrenato I; Sperati F; Musicco F; Pozzi AF; di Turi A; Caterino M; de Lutio di Castelguidone E; Setola SV; Bellomi M; Neumaier CE; Conti L; Cigliana G; Merola R; Antenucci A; Orlandi G; Giordano A; Barba M; Canitano S J Cell Physiol; 2018 Mar; 233(3):2572-2580. PubMed ID: 28777459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in patients undergoing intravenous pyelography: a prospective controlled study. Chuang FR; Chen TC; Wang IK; Chuang CH; Chang HW; Ting-Yu Chiou T; Cheng YF; Lee WC; Chen WC; Yang KD; Lee CH Ren Fail; 2009; 31(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 19288321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is contrast-related vasodilatation after intra-coronary iodixanol and iopromide in vivo endothelium-dependent? Wellnhofer E; Dreysse S; Fleck E Eur J Echocardiogr; 2001 Dec; 2(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 11888823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Myelography with a dimeric (iodixanol) and a monomeric (iohexol) contrast medium: a clinical multicentre comparative study. Skalpe IO; Bonneville JF; Grane P; Gyldenstedt C; Otto B; Kristoffersen DT; Svaland MG Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(6):1054-7. PubMed ID: 9683718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Split-bolus MDCT urography: Upper tract opacification and performance for upper tract tumors in patients with hematuria. Maheshwari E; O'Malley ME; Ghai S; Staunton M; Massey C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 20093609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Iodixanol and Iopromide in Patients With Renal Insufficiency and Congestive Heart Failure Undergoing Coronary Angiography by Hemodynamic Monitoring. Qian G; Yang YQ; Dong W; Cao F; Chen YD Angiology; 2017 Nov; 68(10):907-913. PubMed ID: 28401790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systemic Hypotension Following Intravenous Administration of Nonionic Contrast Medium During Computed Tomography: Iopromide Versus Iodixanol. Widmann G; Bale R; Ulmer H; Putzer D; Schullian P; Wiedermann FJ; Lederer W Anesth Analg; 2018 Mar; 126(3):769-775. PubMed ID: 28806208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of iodinated contrast media on renal perfusion: A randomized comparison study in pigs using quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Lamby P; Jung F; Graf S; Schellenberg L; Falter J; Platz-da-Silva N; Schreml S; Prantl L; Franke RP; Jung EM Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13125. PubMed ID: 29030579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Iodixanol and iohexol in cardioangiography. A comparative vectorcardiographic study. Flinck A; Selin K; Björneld L; Nossen JO Acta Radiol; 2000 Jul; 41(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 10937764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]