These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12664191)

  • 1. Strain differences in response to escapable and inescapable novel environments and their ability to predict amphetamine-induced locomotor activity.
    Miserendino MJ; Haile CN; Kosten TA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 May; 167(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 12664191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central neurotensin receptor activation produces differential behavioral responses in Fischer and Lewis rats.
    Bauco P; Rompré PP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Jul; 168(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 12682711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rat strain differences in open-field behavior and the locomotor stimulating and rewarding effects of amphetamine.
    Stöhr T; Schulte Wermeling D; Weiner I; Feldon J
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Apr; 59(4):813-8. PubMed ID: 9586836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetics of novelty seeking, amphetamine self-administration and reinstatement using inbred rats.
    Meyer AC; Rahman S; Charnigo RJ; Dwoskin LP; Crabbe JC; Bardo MT
    Genes Brain Behav; 2010 Oct; 9(7):790-8. PubMed ID: 20618445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inbred Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains differ not only in novelty- and amphetamine-induced behaviors, but also in dopamine transporter activity in vivo.
    Gulley JM; Everett CV; Zahniser NR
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1151():32-45. PubMed ID: 17395161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex, but not repeated maternal separation during the first postnatal week, influences novel object exploration and amphetamine sensitivity.
    Hensleigh E; Smedley L; Pritchard LM
    Dev Psychobiol; 2011 Mar; 53(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 20886535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novelty response and 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations: Differential prediction of locomotor and affective response to amphetamine in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Garcia EJ; Cain ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Feb; 233(4):625-37. PubMed ID: 26564232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strain differences in the behavioural outcome of neonatal ventral hippocampal lesions are determined by the postnatal environment and not genetic factors.
    Wood GK; Marcotte ER; Quirion R; Srivastava LK
    Eur J Neurosci; 2001 Sep; 14(6):1030-4. PubMed ID: 11595041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption.
    Pelloux Y; Costentin J; Duterte-Boucher D
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jan; 171(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 12961061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
    Klebaur JE; Bevins RA; Segar TM; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Jul; 12(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11548112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.
    Bevins RA; Peterson JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioural and hormonal differences between two Lewis rat lines.
    Stöhr T; Szuran T; Pliska V; Feldon J
    Behav Brain Res; 1999 Jun; 101(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 10372572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amphetamine and stress responses in developmentally lead-exposed rats.
    Virgolini MB; Volosin M; Fulginiti AS; Cancela LM
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 15019963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-lasting, sex- and age-specific effects of social stressors on corticosterone responses to restraint and on locomotor responses to psychostimulants in rats.
    McCormick CM; Robarts D; Kopeikina K; Kelsey JE
    Horm Behav; 2005 Jun; 48(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15919386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetamine in rats.
    Robinet PM; Rowlett JK; Bardo MT
    Behav Processes; 1998 Jul; 44(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24896722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of early handling on amphetamine-induced locomotor activation and conditioned place preference in the adult rat.
    Campbell J; Spear LP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Apr; 143(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 10326781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference.
    Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 May; 63(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 10340533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders.
    Wooters TE; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Sep; 188(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16896959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rat strain differences in responses of plasma prolactin and PRL mRNA expression after acute amphetamine treatment or restraint stress.
    Klenerova V; Sida P; Hynie S; Jurcovicova J
    Cell Mol Neurobiol; 2001 Feb; 21(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 11440201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.