270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12664925)
1. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool?
Hibbert M
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Criminal DNA databank statutes and medical research.
Bressler DD
Jurimetrics; 2002; 43(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 15233123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
Cavoli JG
Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
Dash JF
J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
Yee YH
Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
Donnan S
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control?
Tracy PE; Morgan V
J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensics. The FBI's national DNA database.
Hoyle R
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Nov; 16(11):987. PubMed ID: 9831012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
Rosen C
New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
Doot GM
Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
Love SH
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders.
Raab S
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
Burk DL
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The retention of forensic DNA samples: a socio-ethical evaluation of current practices in the EU.
Van Camp N; Dierickx K
J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 18667650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism.
Gostin LO; Hodge JG
Jurimetrics; 1999; ():21-58. PubMed ID: 12465649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expanding databases, declining liberties.
Simoncelli T; Wallace H
Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):3-8, 18. PubMed ID: 16789300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
Kimel CW
Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
