381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12664939)
21. The business of stem cells.
Spar D
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 15254279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Stem cells. Restiveness grows at NIH over Bush research restrictions.
Holden C
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):334-5. PubMed ID: 15831721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Congress debates stem cell research.
Novak K
Nat Med; 2000 Jun; 6(6):614. PubMed ID: 10835663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Stem cell research and conditional federal funding: do state laws allowing more extensive research pose a problem for federalism?
Schiller C
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2004 May; 31(4):1017-54. PubMed ID: 16514766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The stem cell debate.
Dasgupta S
Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 12199296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Teetering on the brink.
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):987. PubMed ID: 20944563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The ethics of control.
Charo RA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 143-55. PubMed ID: 12664940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Essays on science and society. Morals and primordials.
Guenin LM
Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5522):1659-60. PubMed ID: 11387460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Institutional review boards have new role in stem cell research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11913434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Fowler HL
Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A false choice. Science should trump politics in the stem-cell debate.
Borger G
US News World Rep; 2001 Jul; 131(1):27. PubMed ID: 11447651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Mother of all cells. Scientists hope for huge benefits from the surge of research on embryonic stem cells.
Cookson C
Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A6-11. PubMed ID: 16008293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
Holden C; Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum.
Hatch OG
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Federal funding of human embryo stem cell research: advocating a broader approach.
Braswell JR
Chic Kent Law Rev; 2003; 78(1):423-43. PubMed ID: 15156895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Obama executive order. For Congress and NIH, headaches ahead on stem cells.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1552-3. PubMed ID: 19299595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Embryo stem-cell work gets NIH go-ahead.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6799):925. PubMed ID: 10984022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Progress with stem cells: stuck or unstuck?
Berg P
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1953. PubMed ID: 11557846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Washington insider: federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 16425497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
