These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12665698)

  • 1. First all-solid pediatric phantom for dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in infants.
    Picaud JC; Duboeuf F; Vey-Marty V; Delams P; Claris O; Salle BL; Rigo J
    J Clin Densitom; 2003; 6(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12665698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement in the accuracy of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for whole body and regional analysis of body composition: validation using piglets and methodologic considerations in infants.
    Brunton JA; Weiler HA; Atkinson SA
    Pediatr Res; 1997 Apr; 41(4 Pt 1):590-6. PubMed ID: 9098865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solid anthropomorphic infant whole-body DXA phantom: design, evaluation, and multisite testing.
    Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    Pediatr Res; 2013 Nov; 74(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 23999072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of bone mass and body composition measurements in small subjects with pencil beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Feb; 23(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14963057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.
    Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 15449572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phantoms for cross-calibration of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in infants.
    Hammami M; Picaud JC; Fusch C; Hockman EM; Rigo J; Koo WW
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2002 Aug; 21(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 12166529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae.
    Norris SA; Pettifor JM; Gray DA; Biscardi A; Buffenstein R
    J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10917741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RS; Steinberg FM; Lewis RD; Young RL; Wong WW
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 15618602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens.
    Swennen Q; Janssens GP; Geers R; Decuypere E; Buyse J
    Poult Sci; 2004 Aug; 83(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 15339010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
    Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition measurements in rhesus monkeys.
    Black A; Tilmont EM; Baer DJ; Rumpler WV; Ingram DK; Roth GS; Lane MA
    J Med Primatol; 2001 Apr; 30(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 11491410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of adult and paediatric spine and whole body software for the Lunar dual energy X-ray absorptiometer.
    Laskey MA; Prentice A
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Oct; 72(862):967-76. PubMed ID: 10673948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Dec; 23(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 15637212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies.
    Sutter T; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Cortet B; Lespessailles E; Roux JP
    Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115683. PubMed ID: 33045389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of DXA in obese women.
    Cordero-MacIntyre ZR; Peters W; Libanati CR; España RC; Abila SO; Howell WH; Lohman TG
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 11940727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Cross-Calibration Study of GE Lunar iDXA and GE Lunar DPX Pro for Body Composition Measurements in Children and Adults.
    Khadilkar A; Chiplonkar S; Sanwalka N; Khadilkar V; Mandlik R; Ekbote V
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 30981615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
    Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.