BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666219)

  • 1. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative venous Doppler flow waveform analysis in preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses with ARED flow in the umbilical artery--correlation with short-term outcome.
    Schwarze A; Gembruch U; Krapp M; Katalinic A; Germer U; Axt-Fliedner R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 15912468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus.
    Ferrazzi E; Bozzo M; Rigano S; Bellotti M; Morabito A; Pardi G; Battaglia FC; Galan HL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 19(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 11876805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction.
    Gonzalez JM; Stamilio DM; Ural S; Macones GA; Odibo AO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):e48-51. PubMed ID: 17466679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the non-stress test with the evaluation of centralization of blood flow for the prediction of neonatal compromise.
    Ott WJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10461336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antenatal predictors of neonatal outcome in fetal growth restriction with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery.
    Vergani P; Roncaglia N; Locatelli A; Andreotti C; Crippa I; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1213-8. PubMed ID: 16157140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries.
    Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Lopresti S; Schneider E
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Feb; 41(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 8656410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction.
    Bilardo CM; Wolf H; Stigter RH; Ville Y; Baez E; Visser GH; Hecher K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 14770389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses.
    Baschat AA; Gembruch U; Weiner CP; Harman CR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 12942494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ductus venosus blood flow velocity characteristics of fetuses with single umbilical artery.
    Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Cromi A; Buttarelli M; Sonnenschein M; Dürig P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 12942496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doppler umbilical velocimetry in the prediction of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine growth retardation.
    Berkowitz GS; Mehalek KE; Chitkara U; Rosenberg J; Cogswell C; Berkowitz RL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 May; 71(5):742-6. PubMed ID: 3282193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiotocogram compared to Doppler investigation of the fetal circulation in the premature growth-retarded fetus: longitudinal observations.
    Hecher K; Hackelöer BJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 9(3):152-61. PubMed ID: 9165678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Umbilical artery velocimetry as a predictor of adverse outcome in pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios.
    Lombardi SJ; Rosemond R; Ball R; Entman SS; Boehm FH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Sep; 74(3 Pt 1):338-41. PubMed ID: 2668816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial and venous Doppler velocimetry in the severely growth-restricted fetus and associations with adverse perinatal outcome.
    Ozcan T; Sbracia M; d'Ancona RL; Copel JA; Mari G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 12(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9697283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From biochemical to biophysical placental function tests in fetal surveillance.
    Arabin B; Ragosch V; Mohnhaupt A
    Am J Perinatol; 1995 May; 12(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 7612087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal arterial and venous Doppler in growth restricted fetuses for the prediction of perinatal complications.
    Ozyüncü O; Saygan-Karamürsel B; Armangil D; Onderoğlu LS; Yiğit S; Velipaşaoğlu M; Deren O
    Turk J Pediatr; 2010; 52(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 21043384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction and perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction.
    Breeze AC; Lees CC
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Oct; 12(5):383-97. PubMed ID: 17765669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Non-reactive pattern diagnosed by ultrasonic Doppler fetal actocardiogram and outcome of the fetuses with non-reactive pattern].
    Teshima N
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 45(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8496632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normal values of fetal ductus venosus blood flow waveforms during the first stage of labor.
    Krapp M; Denzel S; Katalinic A; Berg C; Smrcek J; Geipel A; Huber G; Germer U; Gembruch U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 12047533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens.
    Baschat AA; Gembruch U; Harman CR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 11844191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.