These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666642)

  • 1. An example of the use of systematic reviews to answer an effectiveness question.
    Forbes DA
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Mar; 25(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 12666642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews of health care interventions: an essential component of health sciences graduate programs.
    Peacock S; Forbes D
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2004; 1():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.
    Butler A; Hall H; Copnell B
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Jun; 13(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 26790142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature.
    O'Connor AM; Anderson KM; Goodell CK; Sargeant JM
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():28-38. PubMed ID: 24905994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translating evidence from systematic reviews for policy makers.
    Nannini A; Houde SC
    J Gerontol Nurs; 2010 Jun; 36(6):22-6. PubMed ID: 20506938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A framework for developing a coding scheme for meta-analysis.
    Brown SA; Upchurch SL; Acton GJ
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Mar; 25(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 12666644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Improving practice and organisation of care: methodology for systematic reviews].
    Zaugg V; Savoldelli V; Sabatier B; Durieux P
    Sante Publique; 2014; 26(5):655-67. PubMed ID: 25490225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Cochrane Library can answer your nursing care effectiveness questions.
    Forbes D; Clark K
    Can J Nurs Res; 2003 Sep; 35(3):18-25. PubMed ID: 14603566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding and Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Mittal N; Goyal M; Mittal PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 28872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic literature reviews.
    White A; Schmidt K
    Complement Ther Med; 2005 Mar; 13(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 15907679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature.
    Benzies KM; Premji S; Hayden KA; Serrett K
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2006; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17040510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples.
    Boote J; Baird W; Sutton A
    Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):105-16. PubMed ID: 21641075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews and meta-analytic techniques.
    Baird R
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2018 Dec; 27(6):338-344. PubMed ID: 30473037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.