579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666673)
1. Promoting medical research without sacrificing patient autonomy: legal and ethical issues raised by the waiver of informed consent for emergency research.
Carnahan SJ
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1999; 52(4):565-91. PubMed ID: 12666673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In case of emergency: no need for consent.
Brody BA; Katz J; Dula A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(1):7; discussion 7-12. PubMed ID: 9017409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems.
Puglisi T
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency trials 'by popular consent.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2002):6. PubMed ID: 11656475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in research with human subjects.
Moran MB
J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Sep; 106(9):1346, 1348. PubMed ID: 16963335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting research subjects--what must be done.
Shalala D
N Engl J Med; 2000 Sep; 343(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 10984573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical care research and informed consent.
Saver RS
North Carol Law Rev; 1996 Nov; 75(1):205-71. PubMed ID: 11768416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research.
Shamoo AE; Schwartz J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Defendant-researcher claims that federal regulations on informed consent are too vague.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Nov; 17(11):8. PubMed ID: 12708414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trials and errors: barriers to oversight of research conducted under the emergency research consent waiver.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
IRB; 2006; 28(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 16770884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. No waiver of parental consent for research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):4. PubMed ID: 11833571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of escalating regulatory requirements on the conduct of clinical research.
Gordon BG; Kessinger A; Mann SL; Prentice ED
Cytotherapy; 2003; 5(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12944237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do healthy children deserve greater protection in medical research?
Ross LF
J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 12584528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research in emergency situations. The role of deferred consent.
Levine RJ
JAMA; 1995 Apr; 273(16):1300-2. PubMed ID: 7715046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
